• Lady Butterfly @lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Ha! This is so true. Most people have at least an opinion on healthcare companies, and that’s before we look at experiences.

  • Wilco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 days ago

    It just says a jury of peers.

    If a cannibal is on trial you can’t call a jury impartial because none of them are cannibals, or based on the fact that they all think cannibalism is disgusting. Form the jury up, and let’s get this Jury Nullification party started.

  • SoupBrick@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    2 days ago

    They are struggling so hard to find somebody who doesn’t know anything about what happened and why.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      they were blasting his news for the first 2 weeks, and couldnt come up with a way to make it a “left problem” until a month later.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Maybe that’s why? If you blast it loud enough, then you will only find the absolute most tuned out ignorant people to put on the jury.

  • oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    2 days ago

    He can’t get a “fair” trial because the corporations have screwed everyone over for pure profit. Only people who haven’t been screwed over are the rich. It’s a show trial that will convict and demand the death penalty because how dare the rich faces consequences.

  • Infynis@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    If there’s someone out there that hasn’t heard about this case, I don’t think they should be allowed on the jury either. They’re obviously incapable of paying attention to anything

  • hakase@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Neutral” jurors, of course, crucially being ones both 1. ok with corpos killing regular people and 2. not ok with regular people killing corpos.

  • waterore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Gee seems like every American has experienced a moment of wishing they could get revenge on an insurance company and then took in interest in the case where a hero did. Weird that.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I haven’t had an experience like that with anyone I’m close with, but I’m still pissed the fuck off at them because a) I could and b) I have empathy for the many people who have. So they just need to fill the jury with people without empathy.