• HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    when I offered examples earlier, I wasn’t endorsing those views I was referencing arguments I’ve heard others make. Sharing an example doesn’t mean I personally support it, any more than mentioning a conspiracy theory means I believe in it.

    When I mentioned “women’s safety,” I was reflecting how some cis women frame their concerns not my own view. Many of them aren’t transphobic, but simply misinformed or exposed to fear-based narratives, often through social media and sensationalist news. That’s part of why I left platforms like Facebook it was full of that kind of rhetoric even in unrelated spaces.

    I absolutely understand if some people don’t want to engage with those views. But I do believe there’s value in having allies who are willing to engage in good faith, challenge misconceptions, and bring people closer to understanding and empathy especially in a climate where trans rights (and many others) are under attack.

    This isn’t about compromising trans safety or dignity. It’s about strategy and outreach—about trying to build broader coalitions and prevent further regression. We may not change everyone’s mind, but we can still work to prevent them from siding with those who want to strip rights away entirely. In that, we’re all on the same side.

    • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      not everyone is able to follow the same news sources and some people who only get infomation on social media are subject to waves of propaganda news articles.

      I very much understand that. However, this conversation is a classic example of the fact that even being told those statistics and having the context made clear, doesn’t actually change anything.

      You may not have a desire to engage with those people and thats totally understandable, but there should be some people who are allies, who are able to engage in those types of conversations

      There are. Lots of them! It’s why I am defensive with you, because despite the existence of folk like that, you don’t see them, and instead categorise trans people as largely being “all or nothing”. You are part of the group you were just talking about. The group that isn’t exposed to the right content, and instead, only knows what they see in an actively transphobic media and social media environment.

      And as I said earlier, you won’t shift your opinion, you won’t ease off and stop fighting me, to become one of those people that helps trans folk. Instead, you’ll fight me, for daring to take issue with your framing of the situation, whilst blaming me for it at the same time.

      Right now we are literally having everyone’s rights rolled back because thats how fascists like Trump act when you stand up to them

      That’s our common ground right there. Yet instead of talking about that, you’re suggesting that actually, giving in and being ok with some of those rollbacks might be ok, as long as its trans people!

      If you want allyship against facism, focus on the facism, rather than demanding that your allies capitulate to it

      • HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        You keep putting words in my mouth, at what point did i suggest rolling back rights for anyone?

        It seems like you are just looking to be offended, good luck with that, ill leave you to your strawmen.

        • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          at what point did i suggest rolling back rights for anyone?

          When you said we should accept our removal from sports, and that we should be open to exclusion from the ability to use bathrooms in public.

          As I said though, this conversation is an example of why you don’t see the behaviour you’re asking for. It’s because the responses always look like yours.

          • HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            Just to correct the record:

            I’m not in favor of excluding trans people from sports. That said, I also recognize that access to sports especially at a competitive level isn’t a guaranteed right, and has always been limited to the relatively privileged.

            As for bathrooms, I believe all public restrooms should be either gender-neutral or single-occupancy to better ensure safety, privacy, and inclusion for everyone.

            • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 days ago

              The right being lost isn’t the right to play sports. It’s the right to equality.

              And it’s great that your for something that isn’t going to happen in our lifetimes. But in the mean time, trans people have to navigate the situation we do have.

              • HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                21 days ago

                Yeah exactly so nothing i mentioned was actually rolling anything back, trans people never had equality, women never had equality, minorities do not have equality. You will never have equality under a capitalist system unless you have the $$$ and lawyers to backup your demands for it,.

                But please keep being loud about how everyone who disagrees with you is trying to take away your rights (the ones you never had to begin with) and making up strawmen to argue with so you don’t have to address anything in reality. I’m sure you’ll make progress any day now with that attitude.