Maybe ask artists who have their work stolen to feed AI models that then take their job.
Does the death of an artist kill an art form? As you said, art is an expression of creativity. That is expressed in many ways. People have created art before AI and they will continue creating art after. Art isn’t just painting, or drawing, or acting, of sculpting, it can be found in sports, in engineering, in science, in the kitchen, on the playground, in our words, in our expressions, in fact it is everywhere around us. Attributing the death of creative expression to AI is misrepresenting the infinite ways it can be expressed.
Again, this is a problem because capitalism made it one.
I disagree, it’s a problem because people don’t want to evolve.
We are not nature.
We are a part of nature, or you claiming we are unnatural? What even is unnatural? Viruses modify host cells and subvert them to become virus factories, is that unnatural? Monkeys, crows, turtles, dolphins, ants, and a host of other animals use tools to achieve myriad goals.
We can make different decisions besides brutal evolutionary pressure.
Everything is constantly changing. Everything is “evolutionary pressure”. We are in no way unique in our existence. As a species, we aren’t special.
. . . People have created art before AI and they will continue creating art after . . .
All of which would be great in a society that isn’t capitalist. While we still have a capitalist society, artists are having their livelihood taken away.
Again, this is a problem because capitalism made it one.
I disagree, it’s a problem because people don’t want to evolve.
Which is a brutal opinion to have.
We are a part of nature, or you claiming we are unnatural?
We are not slaves to nature. We can make decisions that are healthy for humanity. Killing people’s livelihoods so that billionaires can become trillionares is not healthy.
Everything is constantly changing. Everything is “evolutionary pressure”. We are in no way unique in our existence. As a species, we aren’t special.
That’s complete bullshit. Evolution cares about your ability to reproduce and nothing else. The fact that we have things that do not help this goal is proof that our society is something beyond mere evolution.
That’s complete bullshit. Evolution cares about your ability to reproduce and nothing else.
Ah, the cursing starts when there is nothing of value left to say. Just reproduction? Survival of the fittest isn’t part of it? Also, do you really think evolution is only biological? We do not evolve as a society?
I disagree, it’s a problem because people don’t want to evolve.
Oh. So you’re a social darwinist that believes that they are special enough that they’ll never be in the crosshairs. Great. Here’s hoping that you gain some empathy and a better understanding of human evolutionary and societal history (hint: altruism and caring for others who are unable to provide for themselves is the rule, not the exception).
We are in no way unique in our existence. As a species, we aren’t special.
If your reading comprehension allows, you’d understand that I don’t think I’m special or unaffected by AI. What I do understand is that progress stops for no one. Not for you, not for me, nobody.
We should be working towards solutions like universal basic income instead of crying about AI taking jobs or whatever. Pandora’s box has been opened and the only way we’re putting AI back in the box is by eliminating tech or ending the human race. The latter might be a possibility with how we’re messing up the environment, which would bring the former with it.
Maybe ask artists who have their work stolen to feed AI models that then take their job. Again, this is a problem because capitalism made it one.
We are not nature. We can make different decisions besides brutal evolutionary pressure.
Does the death of an artist kill an art form? As you said, art is an expression of creativity. That is expressed in many ways. People have created art before AI and they will continue creating art after. Art isn’t just painting, or drawing, or acting, of sculpting, it can be found in sports, in engineering, in science, in the kitchen, on the playground, in our words, in our expressions, in fact it is everywhere around us. Attributing the death of creative expression to AI is misrepresenting the infinite ways it can be expressed.
I disagree, it’s a problem because people don’t want to evolve.
We are a part of nature, or you claiming we are unnatural? What even is unnatural? Viruses modify host cells and subvert them to become virus factories, is that unnatural? Monkeys, crows, turtles, dolphins, ants, and a host of other animals use tools to achieve myriad goals.
Everything is constantly changing. Everything is “evolutionary pressure”. We are in no way unique in our existence. As a species, we aren’t special.
All of which would be great in a society that isn’t capitalist. While we still have a capitalist society, artists are having their livelihood taken away.
Which is a brutal opinion to have.
We are not slaves to nature. We can make decisions that are healthy for humanity. Killing people’s livelihoods so that billionaires can become trillionares is not healthy.
That’s complete bullshit. Evolution cares about your ability to reproduce and nothing else. The fact that we have things that do not help this goal is proof that our society is something beyond mere evolution.
Ah, the cursing starts when there is nothing of value left to say. Just reproduction? Survival of the fittest isn’t part of it? Also, do you really think evolution is only biological? We do not evolve as a society?
Did posting this somehow increase your chances of reproduction?
Oh. So you’re a social darwinist that believes that they are special enough that they’ll never be in the crosshairs. Great. Here’s hoping that you gain some empathy and a better understanding of human evolutionary and societal history (hint: altruism and caring for others who are unable to provide for themselves is the rule, not the exception).
Selective quoting. Love it. Forgot to quote this
If your reading comprehension allows, you’d understand that I don’t think I’m special or unaffected by AI. What I do understand is that progress stops for no one. Not for you, not for me, nobody.
We should be working towards solutions like universal basic income instead of crying about AI taking jobs or whatever. Pandora’s box has been opened and the only way we’re putting AI back in the box is by eliminating tech or ending the human race. The latter might be a possibility with how we’re messing up the environment, which would bring the former with it.