• Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well this is the bitch: you can’t play that game. Because the whole point of that game to smash the rules of order. To destroy the social contract. To create chaos and revoke rights. Any move you make is a win for them and a loss for everyone else.

    Don’t play chess with pigeons

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s a false dichotomy.

      You’re assuming that the only alternative to slavishly adhering to the rules as determined by people who could not possibly predict today’s circumstances is to ignore the very concept of rules and procedure.

      I’m not advocating for Dems to do either. I’m advocating for them to change the rules for the better when they can and to bend or even outright break them when it’s necessary and justified.

      Following rules for their own sake even when it’s clearly contrary to the needs and wants of the people is just a more socially acceptable form of authoritarianism.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not assuming a falsity at all - the rules in question are due process

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          So THAT’S where you want the goal posts now?

          Sure, due process is an inalienable human right that should never be infringed upon.

          That obviously wasn’t what I was talking about, though.

            • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              What does that even mean, though?

              Do you consider scrapping a long overdue minimum wage increase because an unelected bureaucrat with a strictly advisory role says it can’t be in a budget bill “due process”?

              Because I consider that a gross miscarriage of justice for the people working two or three jobs and still failing to make ends meet because profiteering employers are still allowed to exploit them horribly.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      So how it usually plays out is that destroying is usually much easier than building.

      So if the oligarchs destroy the rules, you will not win by trying to rebuild them. You will only get back to some sense of normal by shooting back and making them understand why the rules were there. And I don’t mean threats.

      The moment the office of the president was given complete immunity from everything, Biden should have had Musk shot. More realistically, Dems should have fought judicial appointments the same way as Reps did, and actually appointed activist judges instead of trying and failing to appoing Merrick fucking Garland.

      The eleventh hour of the “system” was prosecuting Trump. That system does not exist anymore, there is nothing to defend at this point.