tahira@hilariouschaos.com to Conservatives@hilariouschaos.comEnglish · 5 days agoUnderstanding the Sex Binarywww.realityslaststand.comexternal-linkmessage-square38linkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down114
arrow-up1-11arrow-down1external-linkUnderstanding the Sex Binarywww.realityslaststand.comtahira@hilariouschaos.com to Conservatives@hilariouschaos.comEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square38linkfedilink
minus-squaredemonmittenhands@lemmy.worldBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 days agoIt’s not though. It really really isn’t. The existence of even one intersex person means what you’re saying is nonsense.
minus-squaretahira@hilariouschaos.comOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·5 days agoRead the article. The author has a PhD in evolutionary biology and knows more than you. The “sex binary” does not entail that every human is unambiguously either male or female, even though the vast majority are. He wrote another article where he cites that you are 100% wrong and this definition has been used since the 19th century: https://www.realityslaststand.com/p/citations-for-the-gamete-based-definition
minus-squaredemonmittenhands@lemmy.worldBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 days agoHe also wants to be on Tucker Carlson and Rogan so he’s willing to lie about shit. This guy doesn’t represent the scientific consensus. Just a turd trying to cash a paycheck.
minus-squaretahira@hilariouschaos.comOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·5 days agoHere’s the great thing about science: Is he wrong? If you can’t cite or explain how he’s wrong, hurling insults doesn’t do shit. He very much represents the scientific consensus, as explained by the link I just gave you that you clearly didn’t read.
It’s not though. It really really isn’t. The existence of even one intersex person means what you’re saying is nonsense.
Read the article. The author has a PhD in evolutionary biology and knows more than you.
He wrote another article where he cites that you are 100% wrong and this definition has been used since the 19th century: https://www.realityslaststand.com/p/citations-for-the-gamete-based-definition
He also wants to be on Tucker Carlson and Rogan so he’s willing to lie about shit. This guy doesn’t represent the scientific consensus. Just a turd trying to cash a paycheck.
Here’s the great thing about science: Is he wrong? If you can’t cite or explain how he’s wrong, hurling insults doesn’t do shit.
He very much represents the scientific consensus, as explained by the link I just gave you that you clearly didn’t read.