• Elrecoal19@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Look at this

    And tell me how it looks good. Not the pic itself, but the artstyle. It’s still has traces of that shiny shitty AI artstyle.

    Y’all treat AI as the fucking holy grail of technology. At one point, everything will be plagued by the cheap, shitty version of the AI images, and the better models will be trained on that instead of actual art, and then these cutting-edge models will be just another shitty image generator because it got more shitty AI images than art fed into it.

    The main fucking problem with AI’s quality is that most people aren’t using these high-quality models, most people are using the first thing that they find. And since the people who know about the hugh-quality one are a minority, the internet will be plagued with low-quality, soulless art.

      • Elrecoal19@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        The two first you linked had very notable AI artstyle (specially the second), but that last one was way better. Yet, not the models or efforts the average netizen will use to get AI images, so internet will get plagued with the bad quality ones with uncanny valleys and errors everywhere.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Lmao, try to make the same argument for anything else. “I don’t want people to paint. Most are seriously bad at it and I don’t want my feeds filled with their ugly artwork. Ive already seen that style anyways.”

          You don’t even know why you don’t like it, you’re just doing what you’ve been told to do. Jfc.