US evil projection in world depends on its aircraft carriers.

  • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    …then get nuked or face nato.

    Great, back to the cold war. Let’s not go fully mad ey?

    (for the kids here: mad = mutually assured destruction)

    • humanspiral@lemmy.caOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      While China can nuke/sink a whole carrier group, it can just take out the carrier without a nuke. It would likely be a response to US sponsored aggression rather than pre-emptively today. The US empire does require its existence by having its citizens believe there will never be a threat to Americans or the empire, and that it deserves to win. That is why history needed to start on 9/11, with “they just hate us for our freedom”.

      It would be unclear if US fleet or Tel Aviv were destroyed in a chosen war of aggression on Iran, requires a NATO meeting or tolerance for US evil/empire. If US were to send a carrier fleet to prevent Korea unification, that sinking it becomes a NATO matter. EU is on extreme thin ice for their demonism over Ukraine, already.

      Pretending that the US can protect their populations is what justifies sycophantic colonial rulers sucking up to US on every issue. Hegseth telling their populations that US is impotent, makes the corrupt enslavement of the colonies people to the US more difficult.

            • humanspiral@lemmy.caOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              No one has made a threat. Exercising capability is a hot war. The only people who made any comments are the Pentagon. Admitting that the US is impotent losers is a bold move, Cotton. This is the cold war now.

              • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Yep, you don’t. Have a google search, a cold war isn’t about threats of action. It’s about “look what we could”

      • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        read up to the end. I wrote it down for the kids and those living under a rock for the past fifty years