db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 days agoI keep saying that, but y'all keep hatin'lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square138linkfedilinkarrow-up1555arrow-down157
arrow-up1498arrow-down1imageI keep saying that, but y'all keep hatin'lemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 days agomessage-square138linkfedilink
minus-squaregalanthus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·9 days agoI did provide some insight, by responding to someone that replied to my comment. Feel free to read it.
minus-squaredrkt@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down4·8 days agoI read it. Why didn’t you say that to begin with? We can’t infer what you mean when all you present is a simple, generic statement. Your follow-up is much more clarifying.
minus-squaregalanthus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·8 days agoI usually do elaborate on my points, but you said you were tired of reductive statements, so I thought it would be funny if I made one.
minus-squaredrkt@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·8 days agoThat’s actually funny, it just went over my head
I did provide some insight, by responding to someone that replied to my comment. Feel free to read it.
I read it. Why didn’t you say that to begin with? We can’t infer what you mean when all you present is a simple, generic statement. Your follow-up is much more clarifying.
I usually do elaborate on my points, but you said you were tired of reductive statements, so I thought it would be funny if I made one.
That’s actually funny, it just went over my head