• theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 days ago

    Also, what is the game plan here? To sell GMO exhibits to zoos? To try to do a Jurassic Park, but without dinosaurs?

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      2 days ago

      Releasing wolves in Yellowstone stabilised the ecosystem there. Releasing direwolves on Wall St might stabilise the economy.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      In an ideal world, it’d be to de-extinct fairly modern things that filled a niche that is no longer being filled. This is far from an ideal world though, and the reason in this world is to make press releases to get people talking about it so they can raise more money while not creating anything of actual value.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Okay let’s play that out… Everyone gets excited, they make big strong wolves and get funding… Now what?

        They’ve got a pack of extra big wolves raised under human care. Do they kill them? Do they sell them? Do they open their own park? Do they just keep them for study? Do they just leave the gate open and let them go?

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t think you read my comment. They wouldn’t bring back dire wolves that don’t have a niche in the current ecosystem. They’d bring back things that have gone extinct in the last century or so, or maybe artificially modify existing creatures to fit niches that are no longer filled. This project isn’t doing what would happen in an ideal world. It’s only making garbage to sell to investors to make a bunch of money and bail.

          • theneverfox@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I understand that, but the wolves are living things that require expert care. This isn’t some cat they can take home or some mouse they can quietly put down… They’re stuck with them

            If they kill them, they’d get death threats (people are already attached). If the wolves escape, they’d get protesters. People will likely come to try to see the wolves, the wolves will try to escape and become extra aggressive if they’re understimulated

            Good PR stunts don’t require you to run a zoo for the next 14 years - and whether they allow guests or not, they’ll need a team of people, including round the clock security, to take care of them

            So unless they can sell them to someone, every success they have pushes them further into becoming Jurassic Park, but with less cool animals

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Probably start with one or a few cool scientists with that original purpose, then by the time it can take life it’s gone through the enshittification machine.

    • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      They are making game of thrones real. Lots of whores and titties, big ass wolves, religious cults taking over government, zombies, crucifixions, people being eaten by dragons.

    • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I just watched some youtube video and they were talking about how the CIA and big moneys people are heavily invested in this company. Makes me think they’re in it to make genetically modified animals or even people for “national security” or something.

    • GreatTitEnthusiast@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      The point is to get people excited so they can get funding to keep developing the technologies that will make this kind of genetic engineering commercially viable

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Sure… But now they’ve got these wolves for the next 14 years

        They can’t “reextinct” dire wolves or release them, so they’re now in the zoo business one way or the other

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        And now they have a pack of XL sized wolves… That’s not like making a glow in the dark cat, that’s either the main plan or a very big problem

  • Wilco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Haha … but seriously … does it? I don’t think so. Now if they brought back that rhino species that just went extinct that would count.

  • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Would they be able to do it with god-like perfection, or would it only be a grey wolf that resembles our idea of dire wolves based only on what we’ve been able to learn?

  • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Same question: If a species evolves to adapt to a changed environment, is the original species extinct?

    Yes, yes it is. That’s why a species ‘going extinct’ doesn’t always mean that it suddenly died off.

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    They did have the genome, right? Why not just clone that? They could then add mutations in the amount that normally occurs in grey wolf populations to get a sufficiently diverse population going.