Young men and boys fuelled by “strongly misogynistic” online material are hunting for vulnerable women and girls to exploit on websites such as eating disorder and suicide forums, senior officers have said.

The threat from young males wanting to carry out serious harm is so serious that counter-terrorism officers are joining the National Crime Agency (NCA) in the hunt for them, fearing they could go on to attack or kill.

Britain’s head of counter-terrorism, Matt Jukes, told the Guardian that a joint taskforce would be set up between his force and the NCA to tackle those fixated with violence online, in what he called a “decisive moment”.

Jukes, the Metropolitan police force’s assistant commissioner for specialist operations, said the new pairing would look for those consuming online material about killings or sexual abuse. Those who might go on to plot school shootings and other mass attacks, as well as those who encouraged women and girls to harm themselves, would also fall under their remit.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      It’s a crime and terrible, but it’s not terrorism (ie. Violence for political ends). Terrorism laws allow the government to do all kinds of stuff like searches without warrants and extended pre-trial detention. It’s good that they’re taking these crimes seriously, but the terrorism units should stay far away from this (and should be abolished entirely, ideally).

      And go after the influencers for incitement of crimes. If what Andrew Tate and others are publishing is causing people to do this, they should be locked up.

      • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        This falls directly under current UK terrorism laws.

        If you have proof otherwise I’d be interested in seeing it.

        The Terrorism Act 2000 defines terrorism, both in and outside of the UK, as the use or threat of one or more of the actions listed below, and where they are designed to influence the government, or an international governmental organisation or to intimidate the public. The use or threat must also be for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.

        The specific actions included are:

        • serious violence against a person;
        • serious damage to property;
        • endangering a person’s life (other than that of the person committing the action);
        • creating a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public; and action designed to seriously interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system. Source
        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          What “political, religious, racial or ideological cause” is this advancing?

          • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Ideological … misogynism, girls and women are less valuable than men, men must have power over women, etc etc