• dumpster_dove [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Didn’t we hear a similar story after the Soleimani assassination?

    I’m still on the fence about whether these anecdotes are true, but it’s pretty funny if his advisors give him a list of possible plans while leaving a real dumbass option in there, and he just goes straight for it like a toddler who got to choose between salad or candy for dinner.

    • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I wonder if Trump’s aides, the military, etc learned in his first term that the easiest way to manage President Baby Brain and stop him from doing something insanely stupid was to jangle keys in front of him. And a way to do that was by giving him at least one very simple option. I assume that’s what happened before the US military dropped the largest MOAB in history on a network of tunnels in Afghanistan.

      In my mind’s eye I imagine Trump had wanted to do something even the military blanched at because even they thought it was stupid, excessive, and the body count of civilians looked bad. So somebody had the bright idea to teach Trump phrases like “massive ordnance air blast” and “It’s the most powerful non-nuclear weapon in America’s arsenal.”

      Trump then forgot all about what he wanted to do and said “MOAB” like a toddler who demands ice cream covered in thousand island dressing. Wonderful choice, Mr. President.

  • sodium_nitride [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    Inside and outside the White House, advisers say Trump is unbowed even as the world reels from the biggest increase in trade hostilities in a century. They say Trump is unperturbed by negative headlines or criticism from foreign leaders.

    Therein lies the appeal of Trump

    Numerous more sophisticated approaches were developed than the one Trump selected, people familiar with the matter said.

    Would mind sharing them?

    The White House demanded that Britain and India change their health and sanitation rules to make it easier to export U.S. agricultural products.

    Worry not, the nurglites are in control. Bird flu for everyone.

    In Brazil, India and Europe, they targeted digital regulations that have entangled U.S. tech giants.

    God I hope the EU doesn’t use this as an excuse to scrap privacy laws (like they keep trying with chat control).

    White House spokesman Kush Desai said Trump had assembled “the best and brightest economic team in modern history” to develop the tariff plan.

    The best and brightest of mainstream economists? Wouldn’t be surprised if this was actually true, given how dumb economists are.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      they targeted digital regulations that have entangled U.S. tech giants.

      in brazil, we were about to pass regulation requiring much more transparency from us big tech.

      they essentially just said no, and it didn’t.

    • combat_brandonism [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Numerous more sophisticated approaches were developed than the one Trump selected, people familiar with the matter said.

      Would mind sharing them?

      yeah this is def just some stenography for whoever talked to this ‘journalist’ to signal to their industry (finance) that this wasn’t their idea, so that they can get a job after this administration

    • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      “the best and brightest economic team in modern history”

      “President Trump - here’s what we suggest…”

      “It’s got a lotta numbers and formulas. Too many numbers and formulas…” He takes out a sharpie.

  • hotspur@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Apparently, according to the AEI (the fact that they are lambasting this is notable in itself, but perhaps libertarians are constitutionally against tariffs, I don’t pay a lot of attention to them) even the equation they used has incorrect variables, relying on retail price instead of import price for the calculations, which is obviously incorrect, since that would conflate US markup as something the originating exporter was doing as a tariff. In any case, they’re saying the tariff calc delivers values 4x higher than they should be using this particular calculation. If it was correct, most tariffs wouldn’t be higher than the 10% floor the admin specified.

      • hotspur@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Yeah ok makes sense. It’s a form of govt interference in the all-powerful market.

          • hotspur@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Yeah exactly. They’ve got a lot of bad ideas, but they are reliable about it. It’s better than the pure grifters that seem to make up the rest of politics at least, you can at least know what they’re gonna be on about, and why.

  • BodyBySisyphus [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Foreign trade negotiators have been flummoxed by the White House strategy and occasional mixed messages coming from Trump and his top lieutenants. At times, U.S. officials appeared focused on pushing back on foreign tariffs, leading their foreign counterparts to wonder whether they could avoid U.S. tariffs by cutting their own, a development that would lead to more free trade, not less of it.

    But at other moments, U.S. leaders appeared more focused on fundamentally reshaping global trade and the U.S. economy by breaking the generations-long U.S. dependence on imports. If that is the strategy, no amount of negotiation from other nations can shift tariffs, the diplomat said.

    This is what’s been driving my feeling that we’re in for a doozy and why I’m not really buying the arguments that Trump has a master plan to use the dollar to snap the reigns on a world that’s been trying to buck the US’s control. They ran a vibes-based campaign on the white middle class’s vague awareness of their eroding position, articulated through a crude losing/winning binary, and now they’re trying to “win” but Trump has no clue what that even looks like. You can’t negotiate with someone who can’t define what they want. You can’t even capitulate to it. The pain will continue until someone comes up with a clever way to satisfy Trump’s ego and make him look like a tough guy in front of his voters and until then it’s anyone’s guess.

  • kalabaza [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    So you’re telling me Donald J Trump himself was accountable for the tariffs and that basically JDPON Don is real?