• AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    5 days ago

    All this pedantism about century start dates, and everyone missed they could have called her a millennium baby but went for century instead.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Plot twist: Centuries end in “0”, they don’t start in “0”.

      The 21st Century started 1/1/2001.

      • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Mathematics and languages have different rules.

        In languages it is possible for one century to be a yewa shorter than all the others. Other centuries begin on a year divisible by hundred, but centuries 1–99 and -1–-99 don’t. They are both missing a year, and outside mathematics that’s just fine.

        If almost all native speakers of a language say that a century begins in a year divisible by hundred then that’s how it goes in that language.

      • usrtrv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Correct.

        The 1st century started at 1 A.D. and included 100. 2nd century started 101 to 200. Etc etc. If you change the 21st century to be 2000. You would to shift everything down. Eventually making the 1st century 99 years. Or creating a year 0 or using 1BC.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s complicated.

      There’s a “strict” way and then there’s a “common perception and practice” way. You’re thinking of the strict way.

      But yeah, sure. I guess it’s due to the fact that we don’t have a year zero, really, which is counterintuitive for us in the modern era, I suppose. At least for me.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      How so? The first century surely started with year 0, the first year. Just like a person is zero years old during its first year. And years 0-99 make up the first century. Then the second century starts at 100-199, and so on. 🤷‍♂️

          • falseprophet@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 days ago

            In many Asian countries they do if I am not mistaken but it irrelevant to when the millennium starts anyway

            • Victor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              In many Asian countries they do if I am not mistaken

              Huh, that’s really interesting ☺️ kinda cute ngl

        • i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          There is no year 1 in our current calendar system either. The Gregorian Calendar begins in 1582. The Julian Calendar includes year 1, but changed in year 8, so 0001-01-01 is a slightly different day in the Gregorian Calendar, the Julian Calendar, and the old Julian Calendar. 2000 years after Julian Calendar 0001-01-01 is late December 2000.

          This has less meaning in China because China used its own calendar until 1911. People living in China 2000 years before 2001-01-01 would not have called it year 1.