irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.eeM to [Moved to !iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.dev, check pinned post.] iiiiiiitttttttttttt.@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-219 days agoThe devil did this.i.postimg.ccimagemessage-square126linkfedilinkarrow-up1998arrow-down112
arrow-up1986arrow-down1imageThe devil did this.i.postimg.ccirelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.eeM to [Moved to !iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.dev, check pinned post.] iiiiiiitttttttttttt.@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-219 days agomessage-square126linkfedilink
minus-squareslazer2au@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·4 months agoAre you sure? Have you ever looked at the header of an email from knowb4 or phishme? The emails come from their own mail servers.
minus-squareDigitalDilemma@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 months agoYes, absolutely. We used to use knowbe4. I’m not saying they didn’t do this in the past, but I know for certain they didn’t when I checked. There were obviously hints - the campagns are designed to be detectable - but easy filtering was not one of them, that would be stupid.
Are you sure? Have you ever looked at the header of an email from knowb4 or phishme? The emails come from their own mail servers.
Yes, absolutely. We used to use knowbe4. I’m not saying they didn’t do this in the past, but I know for certain they didn’t when I checked.
There were obviously hints - the campagns are designed to be detectable - but easy filtering was not one of them, that would be stupid.