Summary:


Facing pressure from his right flank to take on judges who have ruled against President Donald Trump, Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., on Tuesday floated the possibility of Congress eliminating some federal courts.

It’s the latest attack from Republicans on the federal judiciary, as courts have blocked a series of actions taken by the Trump administration. In addition to funding threats, Trump and his conservative allies have called for the impeachment of certain federal judges who have ruled against him, most notably U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, who attempted to halt Trump from using the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan migrants.

“We do have the authority over the federal courts, as you know. We can eliminate an entire district court. We have power of funding over the courts and all these other things,” Johnson told reporters on Tuesday. “But desperate times call for desperate measures, and Congress is going to act.”

Johnson, a former constitutional attorney, later clarified that he was making a point about Congress’ “broad authority” over the “creation, maintenance and the governance” of the courts. Article III of the Constitution established the Supreme Court but gave Congress the power to “ordain and establish” lower federal courts.

Congress has eliminated courts in the past. In 1913, for example, Congress abolished the Commerce Court and its judges were redistributed to the federal appeals court, according to Congress.gov. And in 1982, Congress passed legislation abolishing the Article III Court of Claims and U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, and established the Article I Court of Federal Claims and the Article III U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.


  • Chris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    One of the methods floated was just defund it. Maybe the judges are wealthy enough to work for free but our Judiciary runs on the backs of many civil servants that aren’t judges. If there is no budget then the courts effectively cease to exist.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      Future opening to federal court proceedings:

      “All rise. Presiding is the honorable Elizabeth Jackson.”

      “Thank you, bailiff. We’re meeting today on case number 2940184, the US vs Kreiger on the crime of drug kingpin. Before we begin, first a word from our sponsor”

      “Rachet Strap! The energy drink illegal in 3 states! The drink the forbidden energy!!”

      “Prosecution, you may call your first witness.”

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I mean just ask Clarence Thomas. From what I’ve gleaned, he hasn’t paid for shit in years.