cross-posted from: https://lemmy.run/post/15922

Running Commands in Parallel in Linux

In Linux, you can execute multiple commands simultaneously by running them in parallel. This can help improve the overall execution time and efficiency of your tasks. In this tutorial, we will explore different methods to run commands in parallel in a Linux environment.

Method 1: Using & (ampersand) symbol

The simplest way to run commands in parallel is by appending the & symbol at the end of each command. Here’s how you can do it:

command_1 & command_2 & command_3 &

This syntax allows each command to run in the background, enabling parallel execution. The shell will immediately return the command prompt, and the commands will execute concurrently.

For example, to compress three different files in parallel using the gzip command:

gzip file1.txt & gzip file2.txt & gzip file3.txt &

Method 2: Using xargs with -P option

The xargs command is useful for building and executing commands from standard input. By utilizing its -P option, you can specify the maximum number of commands to run in parallel. Here’s an example:

echo -e "command_1\ncommand_2\ncommand_3" | xargs -P 3 -I {} sh -c "{}" &

In this example, we use the echo command to generate a list of commands separated by newline characters. This list is then piped (|) to xargs, which executes each command in parallel. The -P 3 option indicates that a maximum of three commands should run concurrently. Adjust the number according to your requirements.

For instance, to run three different wget commands in parallel to download files:

echo -e "wget http://example.com/file1.txt\nwget http://example.com/file2.txt\nwget http://example.com/file3.txt" | xargs -P 3 -I {} sh -c "{}" &

Method 3: Using GNU Parallel

GNU Parallel is a powerful tool specifically designed to run jobs in parallel. It provides extensive features and flexibility. To use GNU Parallel, follow these steps:

  1. Install GNU Parallel if it’s not already installed. You can typically find it in your Linux distribution’s package manager.

  2. Create a file (e.g., commands.txt) and add one command per line:

    command_1
    command_2
    command_3
    
  3. Run the following command to execute the commands in parallel:

    parallel -j 3 < commands.txt
    

    The -j 3 option specifies the maximum number of parallel jobs to run. Adjust it according to your needs.

For example, if you have a file called urls.txt containing URLs and you want to download them in parallel using wget:

parallel -j 3 wget {} < urls.txt

GNU Parallel also offers numerous advanced options for complex parallel job management. Refer to its documentation for further information.

Conclusion

Running commands in parallel can significantly speed up your tasks by utilizing the available resources efficiently. In this tutorial, you’ve learned three methods for running commands in parallel in Linux:

  1. Using the & symbol to run commands in the background.
  2. Utilizing xargs with the -P option to define the maximum parallelism.
  3. Using GNU Parallel for advanced parallel job management.

Choose the method that best suits your requirements and optimize your workflow by executing commands concurrently.

  • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thank you for this! Always wanted to try Parallel, but jumping straight into manpage discouraged me. This example makes perfect sense!

    • addie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Messing about with a file seems a bit superfluous when you could just use a ‘here document’, even straight into the shell:

      $ parallel -j 3 << EOF
        sleep 5 && echo five
        sleep 3 && echo three
        sleep 1 && echo one
      EOF
      

      outputs what you’d expect:

      one
      three
      five
      
      • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        HEREDOCs have their place, but I always prefer a file if possible, as their formatting is never nice nor consistent. I do appreciate having an option, though!

  • fatboy93@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Love posts like this, because I can plug a tool that I revently found!

    Its called ParaFly and i use it a lot on HPCs. Doesn’t really have a multi-node support, but it also offers logging and resuming of jobs.

    So your point 3 is essentially this: ParaFly -c commands.txt -CPU N where N is the number of jobs you want to run in parallel

    • root@lemmy.runOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hmm I didn’t know about ParaFly, so something I learned today as well 😀 .

    • 30021190@lemmy.cloud.aboutcher.co.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      For anyone else reading this, please make sure this tool is correct for your HPC.

      I would be annoyed at my users if they tried using any of these tools without fully understanding it fully and judging using the scheduler Vs paralellism correctly.

      • fatboy93@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Absolutely! Sometimes its just easier for me to keep jobs in a single list and run them on a big fat node rather than array submit and block half the queue!

  • zero_iq@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t forget pipes: |

    cmd1 | cmd2 | cmd3

    …will run all 3 in parallel: cmd3 can be processing cmd’s output while cmd2 is generating new data, and so on.

    How much parallism actually occurs depends on the nature of the processing being done, but it is a powerful technique, which can be combined with the others to great effect.

  • fox@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    love parallel !, for example encoding a bunch wavs to opus:

    parallel --eta 'opusenc --bitrate 256 {} {.}.opus' ::: *.wav
    
  • andybug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using xargs forever and never noticed the -P option, thanks!

    For some reason I always remember parallel being difficult to use, but maybe I was always trying to do something difficult like processing different batches of files simultaneously.

  • dlarge6510@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    GNU Parallel can also run jobs across the network on other machines as well as the local CPUs