• recall519@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Those are for SSA, not SBA. They don’t explain why SBA would be brokering business loans with 11yos. There is likely a valid explanation here, but the media doesn’t need to get up in arms until more details are available.

    • lefaucet@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      DOGE looks to be what’s getting all up in arms here. If there’s suspicion of corruption, investigate, Don’t just cut it all off! This isn’t a car factory, it’s food and shelter, aka the economy!

      Of course I think he knows this and is actually trying to bring about a recession so he can seize whatever power he can

      • recall519@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I agree, but the Twitter post isn’t DOGE and is potentially incorrect. You don’t battle disinformation with more disinformation.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      There’s nothing unlawful or untwart about an 11yr old getting a business loan if they have a business, that’s just a motivated kid. If not investigate and then shut it down if it’s fraud, don’t just read the title and cut it based off that.

      • recall519@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        You clearly don’t know the basics of how an SBA loan works so I’m not sure why you are even making statements as if you’re an expert.

        Also, I’m not giving an opinion on the legality of the situation. I’m stating the Twitter post is based on no provided evidence so everyone in this thread defending against another ridiculous statement with more ridiculous statements shows that both sides are equally willfully ignorant and susceptible to propaganda.

        I’m on the side that thinks it’s likely a record keeping error because the names do not match the SSNs. Also, banks are the actual lenders behind SBAs and it’s highly unlikely that in one specific year, banks decided to loan out over $300m to over thousands of businesses with credit checks that did not match the name returned on an SSN with the name of the person being lent too.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s not a counterargument that’s a bad attempt to strawman. Similarly there are zero age restrictions on an SBA loan, none zero.

          There’s no need to defend against either, they’re both legal.

          Probably, that doesn’t change the fact that it wouldn’t be illegal even if the ages are correct.