Germany is at a crossroads when it comes to its security policy — one of the deepest upheavals of the post-War era.

  • Kissaki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The article advocates/answers with infrastructure should be prepared so it can be purposed if it should ever be necessary.

    There is, however, a third option: nuclear hedging. In this model, a country does not develop nuclear weapons outright but instead builds the technological capacity to produce them if ever deemed necessary.

    Most of the comments here seem to discuss the headline instead - whether it should equip.

    • Melchior@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Germany maintains the uranium enrichment plant and a the ability to turn that into nuclear fuel. That is what is needed to build a simple uranium based nuclear weapon.

      That is why Germany set up nuclear power plants, as they were always meant to finance and develop those facilities. Since they are now esteblished there is no reason to keep the power plants around. They are of the wrong type anyway, as they produce very little plutonium, which is the other way of producing nuclear weapons. However Germany still has quite a few institutions being able to built nuclear reactors, if need be.

      That is also why Germany was fine with US nuclear weapons. Nobody wanted to see Germany have nukes themself, but Germany. Hence that deal. However Germany always had very detailed plans to built nukes, if need be. We are talking about having nukes within a few months, if really pushed hard.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is what Germany has been doing for decades with its civil nuclear program, but it turned out to be an prohibitively expensive bondoggle and all the nuclear plants have been shut down now.