• Sibshops@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I still don’t get what a non-covert front is. You said USAID is a front for CIA operations and it isn’t covert when it does these operations.

    Like I’m picturing a pizza parlor which is a front for a mafia operation, but instead of being covert, it is open. So it says “Mafia’s Pizza” instead of “Tony’s Pizza”. Are you thinking USAID is something like that?

    Propaganda certainly does exist. I never said that it didn’t. I’m disputing that USAID is a CIA operation and not an independent organization with it’s own goals and directives.

    • swlabr@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Well, at this point, you’re just being obtuse.

      I still don’t get what a non-covert front is.

      That’s a term you made up, so that’s a classic “you problem”!

      You said USAID is a front for CIA operations and it isn’t covert when it does these operations. […] Like I’m picturing a pizza parlor which is a front for a mafia operation, but instead of being covert, it is open. So it says “Mafia’s Pizza” instead of “Tony’s Pizza”. Are you thinking USAID is something like that?

      Again, you’re the one coming up with this. Stop thinking. You aren’t good at it.

      Propaganda certainly does exist. I never said that it didn’t.

      Great!

      I’m disputing that USAID is a CIA operation and not an independent organization with it’s own goals and directives.

      Good for you!

      • Sibshops@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        Honestly, this looks like you don’t have any evidence to show that USAID is a front for the CIA, so you are resorting to ad hominum as a way to save face.

        • swlabr@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Hey, buddy, listen. I’m sorry. I didn’t mean it like that. Sorry if I hurt your feelings. I love the CIA. And USAID. Really, I do. Please don’t accuse me of ad hominum [sic], that would break my heart. And evidence? Of course, there’s no evidence. The US is a perfect little angel; everything it does is moral and good. It’s just that big old meanie trump making a mess of things, that’s all. Does that make it better?

          • Sibshops@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            5 days ago

            Does that make it better?

            To be honest, not really. Usually when there is a claim it goes, I believe that X is true because of Y reasons. Not what ever this is that you are attempting.

              • Sibshops@lemm.eeOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                5 days ago

                Buttcoin is the future of online butts. Buttcoin is a peer-to-peer butt. Peer-to-peer means that no central authority issues new butts or tracks butts.

                A community for hurling ordure at cryptocurrency/blockchain dweebs of all sorts. We are only here for debate as long as it amuses us. Meme stocks are also on topic.

                How is that relevant?

            • swlabr@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              nah what’s happening here is I am making claim X. Then you go: are you claiming Y? Prove it! And then I go: no. Then you start talking all this shit about covert CIA ops and mafia pizza joints and whatever, showing no signs of understanding that I said X. What choice do I have but to conclude that you are an idiot

              • Sibshops@lemm.eeOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                5 days ago

                Then show supporting evidence for your X then?

                USAID is that it is primarily a front for CIA operations

                • swlabr@awful.systems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  This was my X:

                  My understanding of USAID is that it is primarily a front for CIA operations.

                  Evidence:

                  ??? You want brain scans?

                  • Sibshops@lemm.eeOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    Exactly, you made the whole thing up.

                    USAID is not primarily a front for CIA operations. It is a organization responsible for foreign aid and development. Sure the CIA has used some USAID programs for their own purposes, but that doesn’t mean USAID itself is primarily a CIA operation.