• GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s very inefficient with lots of red tape, processes to follow and meetings with designers, lawyers and managers before the work can start. And then every change must be agreed on by different departments. Each person touching this project will write their hours onto the bill.

    • DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Sounds like my own country tbh lmfao. At the end they will have spent 2 billion and unable to show useful results. It went to advisors mostly. Just so happens that said advisors are related to the decision makers.

      What are the odds? 🫠

      • Johannes Jacobs@lemmy.jhjacobs.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Our government is very good at meetings and discussions. We have meetings about planning meetings. Its ridiculous if you ask me.

        I’ve had some severe mental problems in the past, relying on government assistance for a while. And the amount of talks that are involved with any decision that has to be made, its enough to drive you crazy if you wherent already.