ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 2 days agoCathy, do the math.slrpnk.netimagemessage-square280fedilinkarrow-up11.83Karrow-down110cross-posted to: selfawarewolves@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.82Karrow-down1imageCathy, do the math.slrpnk.netByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square280fedilinkcross-posted to: selfawarewolves@lemmy.ml
minus-squareOBJECTION!@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·20 hours ago My contract states that we make $0.50/hr above union wages You may be right, but it certainly sounds like she’s claiming it’s contractual, explicit, and general policy.
minus-squareSheldan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 hours agoI don’t read it like that. The sentence just says that their pay rate has that amount, not that it is connected to them not being a union member.
minus-squareOBJECTION!@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-27 hours agoWho’s “we” then, if not non-union members?
minus-squareSheldan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-23 hours agoThe people the contract is with, maybe all employees of the company have the agreement. You are thinking way too much into that statement, the way I described is the way it works here, and that seems much more likely tbh.
You may be right, but it certainly sounds like she’s claiming it’s contractual, explicit, and general policy.
I don’t read it like that. The sentence just says that their pay rate has that amount, not that it is connected to them not being a union member.
Who’s “we” then, if not non-union members?
The people the contract is with, maybe all employees of the company have the agreement.
You are thinking way too much into that statement, the way I described is the way it works here, and that seems much more likely tbh.