The hypocrisy is in the selective application of free speech values. If someone in a MAGA hat advocates for free speech, they are presumably supporting the broad principle that people should be able to express opinions without government or social punishment. Yet, if they also call for deporting people who criticize Israel, they are actively opposing that same principle when it applies to views they dislike.
Yes, the First Amendment limits Congress from passing laws restricting speech—but the spirit of free speech extends beyond just legal protections. If someone champions free speech while simultaneously advocating for punishing others for their speech (through deportation), they are engaging in hypocrisy, regardless of whether laws are involved
It is more so pointing out the people who get up in arms after getting banned from a platform owned by a private company. If they are upset about that because of the 1st amendment, they should be upset about this.
The reality is that they are just upset their hateful views are bad PR when presented to the general public.
there is no hypocrisy here.
the 1st limits congresses power to pass laws.
you are no longer a nation of laws.
The hypocrisy is in the selective application of free speech values. If someone in a MAGA hat advocates for free speech, they are presumably supporting the broad principle that people should be able to express opinions without government or social punishment. Yet, if they also call for deporting people who criticize Israel, they are actively opposing that same principle when it applies to views they dislike.
Yes, the First Amendment limits Congress from passing laws restricting speech—but the spirit of free speech extends beyond just legal protections. If someone champions free speech while simultaneously advocating for punishing others for their speech (through deportation), they are engaging in hypocrisy, regardless of whether laws are involved
Has the US ever actually been a “nation of laws”?
It is more so pointing out the people who get up in arms after getting banned from a platform owned by a private company. If they are upset about that because of the 1st amendment, they should be upset about this.
The reality is that they are just upset their hateful views are bad PR when presented to the general public.
It applies to states to so I don’t know where you got that one.