• Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meat is literally dead bodies, which we derive sustenance from.

    Harvested plants would be considered dead (plant) bodies, so where is the difference?

    The best argument I’ve heard so far is the one around sentience, but that gets confusing too, since plants react to stimuli and grass can signal other plants it’s being eaten.

    • Lavitz@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      But the question you asked was about a vegan diet.

      The difference is complex chemical reactions. These complex reactions could be “sentience” but it’s the number of reactions and how they all work together to accomplish goals beyond their singular function.

      Plants perceived communicating is due to adaptation and evolution to protect themselves from predators and fire. They did not develop communication skills like an animal would have to also protect itself. Perception and interaction are not communication.

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      No no. I mean if a plant is nourished by dead animals who have died near them. Or in some places where animal bodies are used in fertilizer.