Andy@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.ml · 14 hours agoThey can't hold out foreverslrpnk.netimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1292arrow-down13cross-posted to: memes@lemmy.world
arrow-up1289arrow-down1imageThey can't hold out foreverslrpnk.netAndy@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.ml · 14 hours agomessage-square28fedilinkcross-posted to: memes@lemmy.world
minus-squareSpruceBringsteen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up20·14 hours agoWhat impact would a nationwide guerilla campaign of vandalism against say, Berkshire do?
minus-squareOlgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·13 hours agoI think we need more than vandalism. But it couldn’t hurt. Where’s Mario?
minus-squareashenone@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·edit-213 hours agoWhy stop at Berkshire? Vandalize any home that sits vacant. We have more vacant homes than homeless in America. We just need to make vacant homes too big of a risk
minus-squareblindbunny@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·12 hours agoNo no no open the house to people that need to crash with a roof over their head. Squatting is the answer. Maybe eve some destructive squatting.
minus-squareashenone@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·11 hours agoThat’s definitely a more productive solution
minus-squarePM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·8 hours ago“Productive destructive squatting” sounds like a euphemism for part of my morning routine
minus-squarewizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·12 hours agoSounds like a convenient excuse to make everything a rental, or to just tear down all vacant homes. You can’t expect these people to sit by an issue they can toss money at to make better for them.
minus-squareeldavi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·13 hours agoeverything they own is insured and you would be doing them a favor if they could collect on the insurance money instead of holding onto the assets.
minus-squareryathal@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 hours agoProbably not. At their level it’s probably self insured, so they lose the money.
minus-squareeldavi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 hours agoSomeone will lose money, but it won’t be blackrock
minus-squarefuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·13 hours agoInsurance will start dropping them fast if it really catches on. A few wouldn’t affect anything. But hundreds?
minus-squareeldavi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·13 hours agoanytime an insurance company withdraws from an arena; they pay out to their biggest policy holders anyways and blackrock has to be the biggest.
What impact would a nationwide guerilla campaign of vandalism against say, Berkshire do?
I think we need more than vandalism. But it couldn’t hurt. Where’s Mario?
Why stop at Berkshire? Vandalize any home that sits vacant. We have more vacant homes than homeless in America. We just need to make vacant homes too big of a risk
No no no open the house to people that need to crash with a roof over their head. Squatting is the answer. Maybe eve some destructive squatting.
That’s definitely a more productive solution
“Productive destructive squatting” sounds like a euphemism for part of my morning routine
Sounds like a convenient excuse to make everything a rental, or to just tear down all vacant homes.
You can’t expect these people to sit by an issue they can toss money at to make better for them.
everything they own is insured and you would be doing them a favor if they could collect on the insurance money instead of holding onto the assets.
Probably not. At their level it’s probably self insured, so they lose the money.
Someone will lose money, but it won’t be blackrock
Insurance will start dropping them fast if it really catches on. A few wouldn’t affect anything. But hundreds?
anytime an insurance company withdraws from an arena; they pay out to their biggest policy holders anyways and blackrock has to be the biggest.