Summary

A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to release billions of dollars in blocked foreign aid within 48 hours, citing noncompliance with a 13-day-old court order.

The freeze, imposed by Trump’s Jan. 20 executive order, halted funding for USAID and State Department programs, affecting hundreds of millions of dollars owed to nonprofits and businesses.

The cutoff forced tens of thousands of layoffs and jeopardized critical aid projects. Despite the Feb. 13 ruling, no payments resumed.

This follows another case where a judge found the administration failed to unfreeze trillions in domestic grants and loans.

  • tamal3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    20 hours ago

    What is the date and time required by the judge? That is PROTEST O’CLOCK, my people.

  • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Whatcha gonna do, judge? Ask again? Wait until deadlines pass? Delay has always been Trumpy Dumpty’s strategy to maximize harm. No conquences means nothing to lose.

    But instead of poking a dictator who doesn’t GAF, how about holding congress Republicans accountable since, you know, they “control” finances. You start dragging them out in cuffs, I betcha it will get someone’s attention, fast!

    • perestroika@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      The ordinary response:

      • find the defendant in contempt
      • send US marshals to carry out the court order
      • alternatively, send them to jail the person who held the court in contempt
    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The next step is the DoJ sends the US Marshalls to arrest the President for failure to comply with a federal court order. Let’s hope they follow through.

      Congress is not withholding the funds, so they are not committing a crime. That’s part of the reason for the accountability executive order, obscuring responsibility.

      • ubergeek
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The next step is the DoJ sends the US Marshalls to arrest the President

        The DoJ is owned by Trump, so I don’t think they’ll be doing that.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          You’re probably right, but our failing system is still intact. Once a constitutional crisis occurs, our system will be definitively proven to be a failure, and will require revision or replacement.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              30 minutes ago

              Technically, yes. The unconstitutional actions taken by the executive branch have been challenged by the judiciary branch. If the executive branch does not comply, the next step is pressing charges. Failure to do so would be a constitutional crisis.

              This is far from the first time that a president overstepped their authority. Trump was checked in his last term over the Muslim ban, for example. Even Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus without authority.

              This would be the first time in US history that the president is not held accountable for failing to comply with a federal court order.

              • ubergeek
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                14 minutes ago

                If the executive branch does not comply, the next step is pressing charges. Failure to do so would be a constitutional crisis.

                They already have refused to abide by the orders… And then all we got was “Well, we’ll check back later, and see if you complied yet”.

      • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        After that

        • marshalls will tell Trump he is wanted in court.
        • Trump gets to carry on as usual
        • Court finds trump guilty of 29 federal crimes, treason and corruption
        • Trump will carry out the rest of his term guilty of those crimes.
        • Trump will carry out as many terms as he wants guilty of those crimes.
      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 day ago

        The DoJ is an executive agency, under the President, currently run by Pam Bondi and Emil Bove. Anyone in that organization who moves against the President is getting fired, whether or not that is legal.

        • perestroika@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          This is the interesting bit - he might try that. As far as I know, something changed in 1969 about the structure of the federal marshals, and the courts no longer hire their own marshals. A comment from an American well versed in law would help clear things up.

      • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        Interesting. I suppose it being an executive order does keep it to the executive branch. It’s late over here and the brain hurts.

        Too bad there isn’t a law that requires the legislative brance to exercise powers of checks and balances. Maybe that’s something to note for America 2.0.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          The federal courts took the first step, ruling the action unconstitutional. We’ll see if the DoJ dispatches the US Marshalls with a warrant for failure to comply. If not, they will be complicit.

          • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            22 hours ago

            The courts can directly order the Marshalls to enforce their rulings. But yes,the Marshalls do roll up under the DOJ. So what happens when the courts give the order is anyone’s guess.

                • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  20 hours ago

                  There hasn’t been one yet. It’s defined as a situation in which a major political dispute cannot be clearly resolved on the basis of the particular government’s constitution or established practice. All steps must be taken until our system has been proven to fail.

  • lectricleopard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    What are they gonna do? Prosecute him? Impeach him? Hold him in contempt?

    Dudes been stealing from everyone for his whole life and doesn’t give a fuck what a judge thinks.

  • nomoredrama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Or what? The judge doesn’t have the power to enforce it. The president has greater power than the judge. The judge shouldn’t even be involved to begin with. The executive order trumps the judges order.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      you’re wrong and let me explain why.

      a judge rules with the force of laws. this is because they work within the judicial branch. these laws are written, voted, and accepted as truth. laws are practically stricken in stone.

      executive orders are orders given to how the government should operate, not how they will operate. without laws to back the EO the order is worth as much as an Arby’s receipt. they are not royal proclamations because America does not have a king.

      Trump and his bastards have broken several hundred if not thousands of laws all under the guise of executive privilege which has ZERO legal standing in court. and before you bring scotus into this, they don’t make the laws they merely interpret them and how they should be interpreted. it’s up to the lower courts and judges to apply or ignore laws as they have been interpreted.

      so to recap: executive orders are not laws, they cannot be interpreted by scotus and thus can be ignored or even challenged by the lower courts.

      as for what the judges can do, they can hold him in contempt, arrest him, and place him in custody for not complying with the law.

      hopefully you’ve learned something and can be less ignorant about a subject you seem so passionate about.

      • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Hi, imma let you finish but just real quick. Laws are laws only if they are enforced. Alrite, take care fella.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          the US Marshals.

          before you even say it,

          blah blah blah “Pam Bondi” “Emil Bove”.

          get a new message, troll. there’s still Americans that are willing to protect the constitution.

          • theluckyone@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            We’ll see. Congress and the majority of the Executive Branch seem to be goose stepping right along with Trump. The Supreme Court is iffy.

            As for the accusation of trolling, you can fuck off. That was a serious question. On the off chance you haven’t been paying attention, there’s serious concern that the loyalty of most of our government may be to Trump and not to the Constitution.

      • nomoredrama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The judge can say whatever he wants. Do you think the secret service will allow anyone to arrest the President?

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          sure they won’t, then the marshals will arrest them for impediment the law.

          then we’ll truly and publicly be in a constitutional crisis.

          no one is above the law, NO ONE.

          • nomy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Have you been paying attention at all for the last 5 years?

            Do you think anyone that matters will do anything to stop him?

            • lefaucet@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              15 hours ago

              It needs to be made so.

              Call your representatives and literally yell at them for not doing more on Trump.