• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I think the sort of generative AI referred to is something that trains on data to approximate results, which consumes vast amounts more power.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Ah, so this kind of tool is allowable, but not another?

        Yes.

        Pretty hypocritical thinking there.

        Not even.

        Different tools with different costs and different outcomes.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Different tools with different costs and different outcomes.

          Both have replaced human labor, why are bringing up costs? No one’s mentioned that, gotta use fallacies to justify the hypocrisy? The outcomes the same. Use less human labor to make art.

          But sure justify one while decrying the other, hypocrite.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I never said I cared about labor, I only care about outcomes. You’re the inconsistent one.