Summary

Former federal prosecutor Sara Levine, fired by Trump, warned on 60 Minutes that the Justice Department is “under attack.”

Levine, who prosecuted January 6 rioters, said she was fired for upholding the law.

Legal expert Peter Keisler criticized Trump’s pardons of Capitol rioters, arguing they signal that crimes committed in support of Trump’s agenda may go unpunished.

These actions undermine the rule of law and discouraging accountability for political violence.

  • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    It’s like the entire liberal world has been conditioned to act like the things that are very obviously happening may happen … not right now though … at some future unknown date … so you don’t need to worry about it really. Don’t rock the boat and certainly don’t miss work tomorrow… just continue consuming and hold tight while someone else presumably sorts it out.

    It’s like a civilization-wide bystander effect.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Always have been:

      I must make two honest confessions to you, my Christian and Jewish brothers. First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      This is what pisses me off about all the people who kept talking about how the Democrats were failing to get voters engaged in 2024.

      If the Dems weren’t doing the job, what was keeping you from stepping up?

      Its like there was a fire going on and people were complaining the firemen weren’t doing enough instead of jumping in and helping.

      • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        My analogy is that it was like someone threw a molotov cocktail through your window, but you let the house burn down because the window didn’t stop the bottle.

      • WagyuSneakers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’m not a politician. I developed an entirely different set of skills. Throwing away my career at the potential of reskilling is absurd.

        And Dems weren’t doing their job. I’m tired of people pretending like that’s acceptable. I canvass. I get people ready to vote. I do my part.

        I can’t even tell you the last time a Dem policy benefitted me directly. What I have in common with them really just boils down to them being the only opposition right now. I pushed Harris like we had to and I’ll never forgive them for running such an unlovable candidate. They knew what they were doing. The second there’s another serious option I’m gone. Dems complete lack of opposition makes them complicit in everything that’s happening.

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          AOC and Omar have entered the chat.

          If you don’t like the Dems that are in power now, you can primary them. If we get another election.

          • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Lmao if you get a primary. Trump wasnt the one who took that away from you last time, and he wasnt the one who screwed over bernie before that. Good job pointing to the two token progressives as if that doesnt prove the other guy’s point.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The Harris campaign spent a billion and a half dollars on “getting voters engaged” and she still lost anyway. All the phone-banking and door-knocking in the world can’t overcome the fundamental problem of refusing to adopt policies the people actually want!

        So please, explain to me exactly what the fuck kind of “stepping up” you expect randos from the Internet, who had no ability to affect the campaign’s platform, to actually fucking do?!

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            That wasn’t enough for the grandparent commenter, who was trying to shame people for not getting other people to vote too.

      • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Probably the part where I didn’t receive over a billion dollars in donations to actually get media attention. A lot of people have been campaigning to get people to ditch the Democrats because they’re controlled corporate stooges for the last few decades, I think you were shouting at them for supporting third parties at the time.

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Read up on how Hitler took power in the first place.

          A lot of people hated him, but they hated other politicians more and decided that letting him have a go at it wouldn’t be a bad thing.

          If you thought a third party was going to come to the rescue in 2024 you have my abject sympathy.

          • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            A third party had no chance of coming to the rescue in 2024 because everyone has attacked third parties in the U.S. for at least the three decades I’ve been alive, and I’m pretty sure for another few decades before that.

            Also, you’re conveniently ignoring the economic conditions of the Weimar Republic that made the rise of Nazism in Germany an inevitability. Just like all the libs ignoring the economic conditions in the U.S. that led to the rise of Trumpism.

        • Soulg@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          And they should have been shouted at. The current system does not allow for third party viability as disappointing as that is.

          • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Uh-huh, and how is constantly voting for the lesser evil going for you? What did you seriously expect to happen? We’d just keep slipping towards fascism but never actually reach it?

            • Soulg@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              You and people like you are the problem, and you’re blaming the people who are being directly affected by the poor decisions you yourself are choosing to make.

    • credo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I realize people have difficulty parsing language sometimes, but she did not say “may signal” she said “signals”. She said he is doing exactly what you both are saying he is doing. Basically: You appear to be in violent agreement with her.

      The “may” only comes in that if you commit acts of treason, etc. on behalf of dear leader, you may or may not show up on his radar.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I realize people have difficulty parsing language sometimes, but she did not say “may signal” she said “signals”. She said he is doing exactly what you both are saying he is doing. Basically: You appear to be in violent agreement with her.

        “Glass houses,” buddy. Check the sentence again:

        Legal expert Peter Keisler criticized Trump’s pardons of Capitol rioters, arguing they signal that crimes committed in support of Trump’s agenda may go unpunished.

        The future/hypothetical part of it that the person you replied to was complaining about wasn’t the “signals” part, it was the “may go unpunished” part. In other words, the legal expert in question isn’t in denial of what Trump’s pardons “signal;” he (not “she,” BTW – you misread that, too) is in denial of the fact that the effect being signaled is already currently happening.