They are?
Try an anonymous search engine on a clean computer, I can almost guarantee your results will be different.
which one of them? i have not heard any news regarding this, none whatsoever
Uhh like all of them?
Lookup the kasagna massacre, and it’s reported to be closer to 50 then 70 and reports aren’t incredibly well vetted which is likely the reason it’s a side note rather than a headline.
Would you link to one? I just used duck duck go on incognito and after fighting several times to convince DDG I DONT MEAN LASAGNA I still didn’t find any news about it.
Like I said, it’s not an area known for incredibly thorough journalism and reporting so things are usually kinda slow to be rolled onto the front page.
Thank you for the links but Wikipedia isn’t mainstream media (it’s trustworthy, but not the discussion we are having) and yahoo… Is it just reposting The Daily Record?
The references are though boss, there’s several.
~~https://www.reuters.com/article/us-congo-violence-idUSKBN1FD2OV/~~
https://www.bbc.com/afrique/articles/cj91m74k2p8o
Also no the daily record is repeating the bbc and afp not the other way round.
Ummm… ? I don’t know how to use Lemmy so maybe I’m missing some context, but the first link (which is showing crossed out) is from 2018? And the second link is in French, is there an English report?
So it seems that the MSM is not really reporting on this… I found a Fox news report (eww) and I saw MSN as well, only after I used incognito mode.
bad argument, all media in this world has reported this massacre? i think you are exaggarating. Besides if i gotta google to know something that tells me that the media has not done it’s job well.
No it means you didn’t do yours.
Research takes time and effort, the shit that you’re being force fed is just what paid the most to be at the top.
Removed by mod
Totally sane responses.
Removed by mod
Be civil
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Be civil
We already know why, but it’s still infuriating when it happens.
Why?