“the more cynical” is a really positive spin on conspiracy theory nut jobs.
Apple only throttled CPU speeds on batteries that were below a certain threshold to avoid them crashing when they couldn’t provide the necessary power from the battery. Replace the battery, which Apple would do for effectively cost, and the CPU throttle goes away.
This was a measure to make phones keep working longer instead of forcing folks to buy a new one. Quite the opposite of the claims here.
Samsung throttled their phones from the start, for the same reason, but would increase CPU speeds to cheat at benchmark tests and lie about the capabilities of their phones. Where are the lame memes regarding them?
Here is a link to back my claims, because I don’t just spout nonsense.
Apple claims that now, after initially denying that they throttled phones for years, and then only announcing that they actually were when they add a toggle to turn it off. Also, they settled a lawsuit paying over 100MM dollars, which shows that their actions were anti-consumer.
And sure, Samsung is equally as ass as Apple. That’s why I don’t use their phones, feel the need to defend their shitty actions, or pretend like they can be trusted when they promise they weren’t fucking over their customers.
Here’s my link to support what I’ve said, but I’d highly recommend you look into a situation a bit before starting an argument about it, it’s just common courtesy.
Samsung throttled their phones from the start, for the same reason, but would increase CPU speeds to cheat at benchmark tests and lie about the capabilities of their phones. Where are the lame memes regarding them?
Who the hell is talking about Samsung? We all know Samsung enshittifies in different ways to Apple. I know it’s easier to pretend that all criticism comes from Samsung fanboys but the reason Apple gets it is 1) because it’s the most successful and most prominently greedy phone manufacturer and 2) because of how annoyingly cultish their consumers are.
This was a measure to make phones keep working longer instead of forcing folks to buy a new one.
Source: apple says so (but only once they were pressured for years). No conflict of interest there.
“the more cynical” is a really positive spin on conspiracy theory nut jobs.
Apple only throttled CPU speeds on batteries that were below a certain threshold to avoid them crashing when they couldn’t provide the necessary power from the battery. Replace the battery, which Apple would do for effectively cost, and the CPU throttle goes away.
This was a measure to make phones keep working longer instead of forcing folks to buy a new one. Quite the opposite of the claims here.
Samsung throttled their phones from the start, for the same reason, but would increase CPU speeds to cheat at benchmark tests and lie about the capabilities of their phones. Where are the lame memes regarding them?
Here is a link to back my claims, because I don’t just spout nonsense.
https://www.theregister.com/2013/07/31/samsung_found_cheating_in_benchmark_tests/
Apple claims that now, after initially denying that they throttled phones for years, and then only announcing that they actually were when they add a toggle to turn it off. Also, they settled a lawsuit paying over 100MM dollars, which shows that their actions were anti-consumer.
And sure, Samsung is equally as ass as Apple. That’s why I don’t use their phones, feel the need to defend their shitty actions, or pretend like they can be trusted when they promise they weren’t fucking over their customers.
Here’s my link to support what I’ve said, but I’d highly recommend you look into a situation a bit before starting an argument about it, it’s just common courtesy.
https://www.npr.org/2020/11/18/936268845/apple-agrees-to-pay-113-million-to-settle-batterygate-case-over-iphone-slowdowns
Who the hell is talking about Samsung? We all know Samsung enshittifies in different ways to Apple. I know it’s easier to pretend that all criticism comes from Samsung fanboys but the reason Apple gets it is 1) because it’s the most successful and most prominently greedy phone manufacturer and 2) because of how annoyingly cultish their consumers are.
Source: apple says so (but only once they were pressured for years). No conflict of interest there.