‘There’s no stress’: gamers go offline in retro console revival
www.theguardian.com
Trend to fix or buy consoles such as Game Gear or Nintendo 64s may reflect a desire for internet-free fun

Rosenau is part of a growing community who are ditching contemporary video games and picking up the consoles from their childhood, or even before their time. And gen Z gamers are following suit, with 24% owning a retro console, according to research by Pringles.

  • edgemaster72@lemmy.worldEnglish
    56·
    6 days ago

    according to research by Pringles

    Well everyone knows Doritos are the definitive chip authority when it comes to gamers, so I would take this with a grain of salt

    • ATDA@lemmy.worldEnglish
      29·
      6 days ago

      Pringles research is usually fine as long as it’s peer reviewed by someone at Mountain Dew U.

      • miseducator@lemmy.worldEnglish
        4·
        6 days ago

        Pretty sure they do mean the chips. This guy in the thumbnail is wearing a Pringles brand apron of sorts.

        • datavoid@lemmy.mlEnglish
          3·
          6 days ago

          “…Data from Pringles, the leading gaming snack…”

          Ya OK Pringles, whatever you say 😂

      • Kelly@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        6 days ago

        chips

        Its a strange product, in the US they were ordered not to call them “chips”, and call them “crisps” instead:

        The product was originally known as Pringle’s Newfangled Potato Chips, but other snack manufacturers objected, saying Pringles failed to meet the definition of a potato “chip” since they were made from a potato-based dough rather than being sliced from potatoes. The US Food and Drug Administration weighed in on the matter, and in 1975 they ruled Pringles could only use the word “chip” in their product name within the phrase: “potato chips made from dried potatoes”. Faced with such a lengthy and unpalatable appellation, Pringles eventually renamed their product potato “crisps”, instead of chips.

        In the UK, they argued they were not “potato crisps” because they though their low potato content would get a lower tax rate.

        In July 2008, in the London High Court, P&G lawyers successfully argued that Pringles were not crisps (the term by which potato chips are known in British English), even though labelled “Potato Crisps” on the container, as the potato content was only 42% and their shape, P&G stated, “is not found in nature”. This ruling, against a United Kingdom value added tax (VAT) and Duties Tribunal decision to the contrary, exempted Pringles from the then 17.5% VAT for potato crisps and potato-derived snacks. In May 2009, the Court of Appeal reversed the earlier decision.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pringles