Earlier a post that handles a common argument of atheists got deleted with the comment “Off Topic”. Can someone explain to me why this is off topic but a post about a Mormon church being fined is not?

Or is it just that it was not “pro” atheism? Is your atheism so fragile that you can’t handle any counter arguments and need to censor them to remain your echo chamber intact?

  • SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh look someone posted the link didnt get banned by making snark comments along with it and it’s to a dumbass who doesn’t understand logical fallacy. Who would of fucking thought, honestly fuck off. I’m not gonna have conversations with religious dumb fucks who do not understand basic concepts such as rational thought. I don’t talk about algorithm development with a 2 year old, why the fuck would I talk with someone who shows the same lack of common sense as a 2 year old?

    • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This post is literally about not knowing what part of the post was rule breaking.

      You sure you arent religious? You sure as shit read as well as one.

      • SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The post was removed because its just like a myraid of other secular “arguments”, the part where they posted a video which has no link to rational arguments. Continued to throw shade and required any commenters to watch their 20mins of rambles when the first couple minutes of the video shows they don’t understand logical fallacy. It had no relevance because there was nothing to debate it was trolling and as such this additional post is the same thing. You came out of the woodwork to comment in a community you haven’t before and think you’re winning here when you clearly can’t even see the patterns of these posts. Once again fuck off bud, I’m not gonna entertain stupidity.

        • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah, right, so I need to be morally bankrupt in order to be a new member here.

          Seems this isnt a sub for discussing atheism, its a new cult formation center.

          • SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Aww look a little relgious apologist trying to equate accepting the fact we don’t have supreme overloads into being in a cult, how fucking cute.

            • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              “hey bud, dont yell at the dude for trying not to break another rule. He obviously didnt copy paste the old post because it rule broke.”

              “RELIGION APOLOGIST!!! OUTSIDER!!! YOU DARE QUESTION AN ESTABLISHED MEMBER?!?!”

              lol ok cultist