Anything better?

    • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      But the shithead exec is supportive of fascists which means privacy is secondary to the desires of the current regime. That’s just a standard part of fascism. And if the current regime is allowing untested backdoor code to be inserted in the Treasury department and NASA and the CDC and most major social media to strip out protections for people they don’t like, climate change, etc. Just imagine what someone who actually supports them ideologically would be willing to do.

        • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I distance myself from companies run by people who say or explicitly support people who say that I don’t or shouldn’t exist. There are a few other things that make me distance myself from companies, but that one is a pretty hard line. (I’m gender “non-compliant” and on the Autism spectrum among other things that have been explicitly said don’t exist, shouldn’t exist, or need to be “cured”). Otherwise, I try to distance myself from any companies who explicitly collect and sell my information and other things that I find problematic, but that’s not always possible.

        • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          People on all social media really can’t seem to understand that the choices aren’t exclusively “everything has a perfect open source, non-profit utopia” and “fuck it, everyone is corrupt so it doesn’t matter what service you use.”

          You are able to do what you can, where you can, to mitigate risks and try your best not to support fascists. Especially when there are a dozen alternatives.

          Then again, maybe people are just arguing in bad faith.