• merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    yet another reason to back flatpaks and distro-agnostic software packaging. We cant afford to use dozens of build systems to maintain dozens of functionally-identical application repositories

    • harsh3466@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m a fan of flatpaks, so this isn’t to negate your argument. Just pointing out that Flathub is also using Equinix.

      Source

      Interlude: Equinix Metal née Packet has been sponsoring our heavy-lifting servers doing actual building for the past 5 years. Unfortunately, they are shutting down, meaning we need to move out by the end of April 2025.

    • ubergeek
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Pretty sure flatpak uses alpine as a bootstrap… Flatpak, after all, brings along an entire distro to run an app.

    • Mwa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Let the community package it to deb,rpm etc while the devs focus on flatpak/appimage

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I don’t think it’s a solution for this, it would just mean maintaining many distro-agnostic repos. Forks and alternatives always thrive in the FOSS world.