kinther@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 13 hours agoWhy are the Democrats so spineless?www.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square66fedilinkarrow-up1275arrow-down113
arrow-up1262arrow-down1external-linkWhy are the Democrats so spineless?www.theguardian.comkinther@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 13 hours agomessage-square66fedilink
minus-squareshoulderoforion@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down23·13 hours agowell, no, not a coup, a constitutional crisis, but not a coup
minus-squarecasmael@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·7 hours agoIdk man I’d say it falls under the definition of coup. With extra steps sure, still a coup tho imo
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up60·12 hours agoIt’s not a coup unless it’s from the Potomac Valley region of the US. Otherwise, it’s just a sparkling crisis.
minus-squareBigFig@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 hours agoEh more bud light than four loko
minus-squareblackbelt352@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up23·12 hours agoIt’s a distinction without a difference. It’s an unlawful seizure of power.
well, no, not a coup, a constitutional crisis, but not a coup
Idk man I’d say it falls under the definition of coup. With extra steps sure, still a coup tho imo
It’s not a coup unless it’s from the Potomac Valley region of the US. Otherwise, it’s just a sparkling crisis.
The Four Loko of coups
Eh more bud light than four loko
It’s a distinction without a difference. It’s an unlawful seizure of power.