QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyzM to Political Memes@lemmy.caEnglish · 2 days agoMeanwhile at DeepSeeksopuli.xyzimagemessage-square112fedilinkarrow-up1913arrow-down113
arrow-up1900arrow-down1imageMeanwhile at DeepSeeksopuli.xyzQuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyzM to Political Memes@lemmy.caEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square112fedilink
minus-squareAtHeartEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·1 day agoRunning an uncensored deepseek model that doesn’t perform significantly worse than the regular deepseek models? I know how to dl and run models, I haven’t seen an uncensored deepseek model that performs as well as the baseline deepseek model
minus-square474D@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·20 hours agoI mean obviously you need to run a lower parameter model locally, that’s not a fault of the model, it’s just not having the same computational power
minus-squareAtHeartEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·18 hours agoIn both cases I was talking about local models, deepseek-r1 32b parameter vs an equivalent that is uncensored from hugging face
Running an uncensored deepseek model that doesn’t perform significantly worse than the regular deepseek models? I know how to dl and run models, I haven’t seen an uncensored deepseek model that performs as well as the baseline deepseek model
I mean obviously you need to run a lower parameter model locally, that’s not a fault of the model, it’s just not having the same computational power
In both cases I was talking about local models, deepseek-r1 32b parameter vs an equivalent that is uncensored from hugging face