• Erika3sis [she/her, xe/xem]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Come to think of it, “Discharged with the use of a contraceptive or contraceptive method intended to prevent fertilization of an embryo.” — what does it even mean to fertilize an embryo? You fertilize an egg to conceive an embryo, but you don’t fertilize the embryo, right? Wouldn’t that be like a matryoshka pregnancy?

    …I guess that means any sex with contraceptives is then banned because contraceptives specifically intended to prevent matryoshka pregnancy do not exist. And how about wet dreams, for that matter?

    I have more things to say about what you’ve written but I don’t really feel like it right now. Maybe when I have more energy again.

    • glans [it/its]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Come to think of it,

      The more I think of this, the more and more and then less, and then more again, things come to mind. It is stupefying. A mindgame trap?

      matryoshka pregnancy

      So we are talking “they’re born pregnant” ala

      Overall I agree this is an exhausting convo. Especially because I doubt either side is 100% correct, and we arguing about how to apply our imperfect analysis to describe a totally bonkers situation which kicks and screams against any framework, even a shitty one.

      Because really the whole thing is some republicans cos playing as klingons who’ve traveled back in time to outlaw tribbles. That’s the hope you’ve given me anyway.