- cross-posted to:
- android@lemdro.id
- hackernews@derp.foo
- technews@radiation.party
- cross-posted to:
- android@lemdro.id
- hackernews@derp.foo
- technews@radiation.party
cross-posted from: https://lemdro.id/post/2469210 (!android@lemdro.id)
cross-posted from: https://lemdro.id/post/2469210 (!android@lemdro.id)
So they figured out that a $130 Thunderbolt 4 100W E-marker cable is better designed than a $10 USB 2 60W cable? I think they should have looked at a cheaper high-end cable, like a 240W Thunderbolt 4 cable, to see how a comparable one compares.
This was my gripe with the write up as well. Like everybody, I’m interested in the least expensive option with similar features to the $130 option. Surely there’s something in the $20-30 range they could’ve studied?