Yeah, I think massive chemical batteries for storing excess electricity to facilitate a contrived green energy market is a bad idea.

  • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    You’re right, but I think less dense but safer and more sustainable options are the better choice for this

    • scratchee@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      We can all agree on that, Clearly li-ion is a bad choice for static use cases.

      But right now it’s the cheapest option, and it looks likely that will stay true for quite a while unfortunately.

        • scratchee@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Weirdly it’s not, except maybe gravity batteries where nice reservoirs happen to exist already. It should be but it’s not right now.

          Li-ion has economy of scale right now. I do think molten metal etc will overtake eventually, but they’re currently playing catchup and li-ion has dropped in price so much over time that it’s surprisingly cheap even where it should make no sense.

            • scratchee@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              56 minutes ago

              I know, I just threw out one of the many contenders for grid power.

              Iron water does look promising too.