• 1984
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They weren’t wrong. There is no need for a panel, you can just type what program you want. It’s not year 2000 anymore.

    Besides, Plasma is much more like Windows. It has panels, lots of windows and bugs.

    • RoboRay@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      you can just type what program you want. It’s not year 2000 anymore.

      Typing the name of the program you want is a 1970s thing.

      • 1984
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Good response to be honest. :)

        • RoboRay@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Only a bit tongue-in-cheek… :)

          Sometimes typing something is better, sometimes just clicking a button is better. It just depends on… too many things to list.

      • TCB13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes ironically desktop environments “revolutionized” computing by not having a way to type what program we want to then, after decades re-introduce that :D

    • TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Besides, Plasma is much more like Windows. It has panels, lots of windows and bugs.

      On that we can agree. And let me add more: inconsistent design.

      • Emperor Palpapeen@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        @TCB13 @1984 still prefer it over Gnome. Besides, inconsistency often arises from the sheer number of programming frameworks involved. If there was a standard way to assure that programs could fill in UI elements to fit the DE it would help out.

        As a non-programmer I don’t even know if that’s possible.