Sen. John Fetterman (D-Penn.) called some of his colleaguesā€™ quickness to blame Israel for the hospital blast in Gaza ā€œdisturbingā€ in a statement Wednesday.

ā€œItā€™s truly disturbing that Members of Congress rushed to blame Israel for the hospital tragedy in Gaza,ā€ Fetterman said in a post on X, formerly Twitter.

  • SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    Ā·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Except it provably isnā€™t. Calling for evacuations before military strikes is an easy and obvious example.

    Allowing Hamas to bombard them with thousands of rockets for years is another really obvious one that no one ever seems to recognize.

    • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-palestine-war-gaza-area-bombed-after-warning-to-move

      https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/israel-bombs-egypt-border-crossing-it-had-touted-as-an-escape-route-for-besieged-palestinians/ar-AA1hYfk2

      Calling for evacuations before military strikes is an easy and obvious example.

      Man, Iā€™m not going to get into a tit for tat with you. Hamas has blood on their hands. That doesnā€™t mean Iā€™m going to pretend Israel doesnā€™t.

      Iā€™m in my 50ā€™s; this is at least the third or fourth time I can remember having the reaction of ā€œWow, Israel gives no shits who they hurtā€ during an event like this.

      How about those illegal settlements which are a 24/7/365 provocation?

      Hamas isnā€™t innocent, but Israel damn sure isnā€™t either.

        • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          Ā·
          1 year ago

          Read what I quoted from your comment, and tell me which of the links I posted supports it.

          The rest is just because I had my dander up at the continuous implication from some that weā€™re supposed to support Israel uncritically.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            Ā·
            1 year ago

            Endeavoring to minimize civilian casualties does not mean there will not be civilian casualties.

            The argument that Israel is aiming for civilian casualties is nonsensical.

            • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              Ā·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So you didnā€™t read the articles or you claim they are false?

              Edited to add - I know the cartoon inserted was from a previous time we were all shaking our head at Israel, but thatā€™s exactly what it looks like overall.

              Edited again to say - at best they are giving lip service to watching out for civilians but taking no care to actually do so. I reject the premise that this would have been a proportional response even if I believed they actually were trying not to hit them. I donā€™t think the folks calling the shots care whatsoever about civilians being on the other end.

              I also think they havenā€™t considered what actions belong in the ā€œGuaranteedā€ category when considering actions that are 100% going to create additional generations who feel they have a legitimate reason for future acts of violence against Israel.