Summary

Two studies reveal that Walmart’s entry into communities lowers household incomes by 6% over 10 years and increases poverty by 8%, even when accounting for cost savings.

Its practices, such as undercutting competitors, suppressing wages, and squeezing suppliers, harm local economies by reducing employment and forcing smaller businesses to close.

Walmart’s “monopsony power” enables it to pay lower wages and dominate suppliers, compounding these effects.

The findings challenge the idea that low prices alone benefit communities, emphasizing long-term economic harm.

——

Non-paywall link

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s trade balance and it’s very well proven. If the money coming into a community is less than the money going out then that’s going to affect everything from road repair to groceries bought.

    This is why at the international level there are balance payments in trade deals.