• pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafeBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        In principle, in a free country, you should be able to. But you can’t, so it’s not actually free.

        • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          How far does that freedom to do what you please extend? Am I not actually free because I can’t beat up people I disagree with? Personally I feel the freedom to disagree without the threat of violence is more important.

          There is freedom to, and there is freedom from. Don’t undervalue freedom from.

        • blue_zephyr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          You’ve confused freedom with anarchy. By your logic you should be able to murder anyone you please or else it’s not a free country.

        • blue_zephyr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          You’ve confused freedom with anarchy. By your logic you should be able to murder anyone you please or else it’s not a free country.