Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoSure, WSJ. Next do an article on Selection Biaspoptalk.scrubbles.techimagemessage-square72fedilinkarrow-up1443arrow-down121file-text
arrow-up1422arrow-down1imageSure, WSJ. Next do an article on Selection Biaspoptalk.scrubbles.techScrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square72fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26arrow-down1·8 hours agoOh nice, you found 1 family that this is relevant for. Now call that family “all millennials”! Proper journalism right here.
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·7 hours agoWell, they did technically just say “millennials”. They omitted the modifier “a tiny fraction of”, but that’s assumed
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 hours agoStrong disagree. When someone says “humans”, does that also imply “a tiny fraction of”? I think that this quantifier is very significant, and needs to be included. Otherwise it becomes misleading.
Oh nice, you found 1 family that this is relevant for. Now call that family “all millennials”! Proper journalism right here.
Well, they did technically just say “millennials”.
They omitted the modifier “a tiny fraction of”, but that’s assumed
Strong disagree. When someone says “humans”, does that also imply “a tiny fraction of”? I think that this quantifier is very significant, and needs to be included. Otherwise it becomes misleading.