• Pavel Chichikov@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    reread your stuff. if you can’t understand how it proves your own stupidity, then you really are hopelessly lost.

        • 1ns1p1d@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          56 minutes ago

          You vastly overestimate your own skills in that department, acid man.

          • Pavel Chichikov@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            44 minutes ago

            said the man who couldn’t refute literally any of my points (and clearly didn’t understand most of them in the first place)

            • 1ns1p1d@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 minutes ago

              I can refute them, but unfortunately you were already being insulting.

              The problem of acid attacks is just that. A problem. One that people are actively trying to fix. Nobody thinks acid should not be regulated. Only the weirdest kind of psycho collects different vials of acid based on their ability to stop humans.

              Acid deaths is the worst countries are insignificant vs the number of deaths caused by gun crime and suicide. Never the less, I still think it’s an issue that needs regulation.

              I do not think acid should be banned. I do not think guns should be banned. So you can throw away those arguments as far as I’m concerned. It your terms, you knocked down the straw man. I’m bored of arguments revolving around logical fallacies. They make me cringe because they remind me of myself in my 20s. Over 30 years ago now. Its doesn’t interest me to try to outlogic people.

              Anyway, where we we? I believe we’ve covered a few mistakes with logic, but I’m happy to point out some more…