• Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Great and all. But can we get something below a state of emergency. Everything seems to trigger one of those these days. It kinda loses it’s meaning when overused.

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      State of emergency just sounds scary but it’s more about unlocking additional funds for issues. My state was under a “state of emergency” for drought. All it ment was some industries and communities could receive extra subsidies for water costs.

      • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Except it often also unlocks executive powers, not just funds. So yes, there should be a level that allows unlocking funds without everyone having to check if democracy is being suspended.

          • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            54 minutes ago

            Idk about CA specifically. But even if none were available, it is still a term that is used for unlocking such powers on the federal level and in some states. So if CA does not have such powers, then just rename it I guess.