• jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    6 hours ago

    If I’m getting 4K content I want that to be a 4K scan of original 35mm (or better) film. I’m not paying for an AI upscale that I can probably do myself for similar quality. If there is no 35mm source (such as it originating on 16mm or electronic television cameras) just give it to me at the best original resolution; 2K/HD or even SD are perfectly fine if that’s the original version.

    I’m fine with the HD/4K conversions some older shows like Seinfeld or Friends got because those were originally shot on film (thank you Lucille Ball) so there’s an original source that’s relatively easy to go back to and just apply the edits, although sometimes I would prefer if they kept the original 4:3 aspect ratio instead of changing to 16:9. Sometimes the framing is a little off or they lose a subtle joke.

    The one area I’d be okay with a little AI upscale (if it’s done well) mixed in is if there are effects shots mixed in that were only ever intended for SD viewing. I first saw this with Family Matters of all shows, showing it to my kid. They’ve scanned the film up to HD but some of Steve’s “experiments” look pretty jarring mixed in.

    • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      This is exactly how I feel. I want the highest possible original quality, without upscaling. There are a ton of 1080p Blu-rays out there that probably won’t get real 4K scans because of lack of demand or being niche content, and that’s totally fine. Just leave it at 1080p, which is still pretty solid for movies made more than 5 or 10 years ago. But if the movie was shot on film, there’s really no excuse for not rescanning it at 4K imo. I’m sure studios/distributors would continue to cry poverty, but screw that. I’m even okay with them leaving any original special effects untouched, especially if redoing them is what hikes up the cost. It can be distracting, but I care more about live action quality.

      I go back and forth on animation, it’s the one time I feel kind of okay with upscaling. But I recently compared an upscaled 4K Blu-ray anime with a subsequently released native 4K scan Blu-ray, and the increase in quality was quite obvious.

      • vaguerant@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’m sure you know this, but as an addendum, the majority of films shot digitally have been filmed with 2K/1080p cameras. Obviously there are exceptions and also modern, effects-heavy films might have their compositing done in 4K, so I’m not saying there’s no benefit to going over 2K. However, in many cases you’re already getting the intended picture at 2K and upscaling is not bringing you any closer to the filmmakers’ ideal presentation.

    • TheImpressiveX@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Hey, we invested so much money in these new AI-powered computers, and we gotta use them for something.

  • kitnaht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    haha, what a bunch of reactionaries. I love how they point to a completely unreadable blur on the original, and go “Seee?! You can’t read that in the upscaled version!!” – as if you could in the original.

    The upscales look great with the exception of some fine detail of the shadows on the back. Especially in cases where they don’t have the original content, I think it’s a perfectly fine way to go about things.

    When you’ve gotta zoom in 100x magnification just to find something to complain about, I’d say that’s pretty damn good. Though I do wonder if “progressive” upscaling would be able to retain more fine detail (upscale from 360p to 480p, from 480p to 720p, 720p to 1080p, in discreet steps) – or if it would just fuck the image up further.

    • paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      The point is it’s fake 4k, and in a real remaster of the film stock, the example of the text would be more readable. I understand that the source material isn’t available for all of the films.

      I think it’s totally fair to either ask for AI upscaling to stop happening on purchasable media, or to ask for it to be clearly labeled as such.

      • kitnaht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I think it’s totally fair to either ask for AI upscaling to stop happening on purchasable media, or to ask for it to be clearly labeled as such.

        Why? People keep buying it. The method of upscaling doesn’t matter to most people - only enthusiasts. It’s allowing a lot more work to be revived from the dead with it as well - overall I think the benefits far outweigh the problems.

        • paraphrand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          For those who care. Just like how audio formats are labeled, and multiple options are provided. Even though most people don’t care.

          Just label it “AI enhanced” or “AI upscaled to 4k”. It’s not too difficult, and it could be a tiny little box next to the other technical details people ignore.

          There would be far less of the “reactionary” reaction if people were not “discovering” the situation after release, and potentially after preordering.

          Edit: also, to be clear, I don’t think AI upscaling is bad in all cases. I watch Deep Space Nine AI upscaled. And that’s another example of source material not being available.