• King@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    current comments defend his current actions so no opinion on that until it happens.

    PS: weird how the no ads option takes more time to develop than the subscription option with 10x features, INCLUDING the no ads one !

      • King@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        30$? That’s only 6x the original ad-free sync price, I take all my greediness comments back !

        • andreas_retsis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          sync for reddit price (there was a pro version too) as you can see the price is reasonable. Where did you find a 6x increase?

          • GroggyGuava@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re showing the price for sync ultra, he’s referring to the price for ad-free sync, which was like $2-3

        • napoleonsdumbcousin@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You are comparing the old simple “Remove Ads” option to Sync Ultra features.

          The new “Remove Ads” without additional features costs 14,99 €. Which, yes, is more expensive than before, but that was to be expected. The old price would have been way too cheap for today’s pricing situation, especially since he also lost most of his userbase.

          • King@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “today’s pricing situation” u mean 2 months ago? Also “hes lost most of his userbase”

            selling 50$ tshirt for 500$ because there are less customers and I want even less what is this argument lmfao

            • napoleonsdumbcousin@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The price was set many years ago and just never changed.

              Also yes, less customers means less income for mostly the same amount of work. That is literally why bigger companies can offer cheaper prices. Scale.

              • King@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                What scale dev doesnt have a factory theres no production, company size doesnt matter

                • napoleonsdumbcousin@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That was in response to your comparison with t-shirts.

                  And yes, scaling does not work in the same way for app development. A large part of the required work for app development stays the same, regardless of how many actual users there are (excluding server costs (-> Sync Ultra) and probably the amount of support tickets). But since Sync has way less users now, there has to be more income per user for it to be profitable.

                  • King@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Ad removal has no server costs and now it costs 2.5x as much as it did 1 month ago