RoabeArt [he/him]@hexbear.net to Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-26 days agoPls don't do Project 2025 😭hexbear.netimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1137arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1135arrow-down1imagePls don't do Project 2025 😭hexbear.netRoabeArt [he/him]@hexbear.net to Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-26 days agomessage-square44fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·6 days agoThere’s even precedent for the President to legally have anyone killed now with the ‘absolute immunity’ ruling Joe Biden could just have a drone turn Trump into a pink mist and memories
minus-squarefreagle@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 days agoI don’t think that’s precedent, is it? Was the court case about murder?
minus-squarePhilosoraptor [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·6 days agoIt was explicitly raised as a hypothetical during the oral arguments at SCOTUS, and Trump’s team argued that it would be covered by immunity as long as the President thought he was genuinely acting in the national best interest.
minus-squaregay_king_prince_charles [she/her, he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·5 days ago Trump’s team Justice Samuel Alito, but same difference
minus-squarePhilosoraptor [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 days agoDefinitely
There’s even precedent for the President to legally have anyone killed now with the ‘absolute immunity’ ruling
Joe Biden could just have a drone turn Trump into a pink mist and memories
I don’t think that’s precedent, is it? Was the court case about murder?
It was explicitly raised as a hypothetical during the oral arguments at SCOTUS, and Trump’s team argued that it would be covered by immunity as long as the President thought he was genuinely acting in the national best interest.
Justice Samuel Alito, but same difference
Definitely