Today after updating Voyager the downvote button was gone. What is the reason for removing it? Is lemmy going the way of YouTube?

  • Quereller@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I dont know about your exact situation but the ability to downvote is instance specific. My instance for example has downvotes switched off.

  • Eavolution@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know but I’ve always thought this sort of place should have 4 buttons for a post. Relevant Irrelevant, I like, I do not like. This way people could disagree with something, but show that they think it is a good fit for the magazine.

    • Arxir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I disagree. There is rarely a relevance for like/dislike and all upvotes and downvotes are, should be viewed as and used as indicators of relevance.

      Upvote what you find relevant/interesting, not what you like.

      Downvote what you find irrelevant to the community or what uses language that you find inappropriate for that community, not what you don’t like.

        • Arxir@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I assume you mean, that you disagree with my idea. In this case I find it a somewhat valid use of a downvote within the system that I outlined. But if everyone downvotes what they disagree with, before actually engaging with the content, it turns Lemmy into just another echo chamber.

          • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No I think you’re right, but it’s unenforceable and indistinguishable. Being hung up on it is silly IMO. More transparent to just do 2 sets of arrows.

            Sometimes the internet needs to tell you that your content is relevant and also people think you’re s fuckwit :).

      • amio@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Indicators of relevance” is fine in theory, but that’s (allegedly) how it was supposed to work on Reddit too, and… it really didn’t. It will turn into agree/disagree for a significant amount of people who either don’t know or care how voting was intended to work.

      • all-knight-party@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You display the problem with that system in your own comment through your wording of “should be”. Everyone knows what downvotes and upvotes should be, but due to their intent being unenforceable they just become “that person liked or didn’t like this for reasons beyond my knowledge and understanding”

  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Does it matter? Who cares about imaginary points?

    While one could argue for the usefulness of the downvote button, the very nature of a mostly anonymous platform like Reddit and Lemmy will naturally lead to its misuse, completely negating its usefulness.

    • UnknownQuantity@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      It matters that if there’s an option to upvote, there should be an option to downvote. Why have only one? What is the point of some instances having just one of them while others have both? I don’t care about points but I like to see how controversial something is when I read comments.

      • 1984
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Upvotes are not abused and doesn’t make people feel like shit.

        The lack of upvotes is a much nicer way to handle the situation.

        It’s similar to real life, where you give compliments to people you like but you try to avoid people you don’t like. Focus on what you like, not what you don’t like.

        • UnknownQuantity@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Today I commented on something and got 12 upvotes. Clearly, people liked my take. I also got 12 downvotes on the same comment and that provided a reality check - my take is agreeable to some, disagreeable to others. Then of course I have to take into account all the users in all instances that don’t allow downvotes. How many people disagree with me that can’t let me know without replying? Do I need to rethink my stance on that particular position or should I just double down on it because 12 people liked it?

          • 1984
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s an example of when it’s useful, but you probably understand the downsides of it also.

            • UnknownQuantity@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              A knife can cut onion, that’s an upside. A knife can cut my finger, that’s a downside. How do we make a knife that can cut onion but not my finger?

              • 1984
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                In this case, I don’t need the knife. Problem solved.

                Sometimes you give up things because of bad side effects you don’t want to have.

                Maybe you want them, which is fine.

    • small44@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The issue is the bandwagon effect. When a post is downvoted other users will do the same without reading the content or forming their own opinion. Some apps hide heavily downvoted comments like reddit which lead to suppressing some unpopular opinions and discourage people from speaking their mind. Hate speech should be reported and misinformation should be debated with strong arguments

      • HardlightCereal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Moderators and users don’t always agree on what hate speech is. For example, people often use my mental disability as a pejorative for people they don’t like. Half of them claim they weren’t really talking about my disability and it’s just a coincidence they used the same word. The other half will say they 100% intended to accuse the other person of being disabled. To me, both are unacceptable.

  • topher@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    On instances where downvoting is disabled, the button serves no purpose and will now not be displayed unless the instance permits it. The existence or absence of the downvote button is feedback on whether or not posts can be downvoted.

    If the button is not displayed then < your particular Lemmy instance > is the one to be accused of going the way of Youtube.

    Interestingly though, since you’re posting from Lemmy.world, I checked the list and your instance does allow downvoting. Maybe it’s a bug for !voyagerapp@lemmy.world

    I on voyager 1.2.0 and downvote button appears for me btw.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is a setting in the general settings panel to show up and down votes on a post, and when I do that the downvote always works for me.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sorry, its settings Appearance.

        Show voting buttons -is set to true

        Display Votes - is set to Separate.

        I’m on 1.2.0

          • GreyShack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m on lemmy.world. This thread is on lemmy.world I have just downvoted you successfully as far as I can see.

              • GreyShack@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You say that you found out that lemmy.world had disabled downvotes. Where did you you find that out? I’d certainly seen nothing myself here - I know that some instances have - and can certainly see and use the downvote arrows.

                • UnknownQuantity@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I found out that I can upvote using the big arrow on the right and small arrow on the left (with the count). While the downvote arrow disappeared from the right the small one on the right remained. When I tap that it tells me that administrators disabled it.

                  Edit: “Downvotes have been disabled by server admins.”

  • small44@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the perfect world there would be no stupid downvote button. It makez everything toxic. If you don’t like something just ignore it, critisize or block the user