• booly@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The value of the Onion’s bid was $7 million ($1.75 million in cash, $5.25 million in credit), when you include the credit bids from the families. That’s where you’re getting tripped up in trying to understand what the court was ruling.

    • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      No, there was no 5.25 in credit. I’m happy to see any source for that claim though.

      There was some future payments promised and a better than usual split for some families, so they “valued” the bid at 7 million.

      • booly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        There was some future payments promised

        It’s not future payments promised. Just a division of who to split the proceeds with. And so for the typical creditor who didn’t credit bid, The Onion’s bid was worth the equivalent of a $7 million cash bid, and therefore was more valuable than the Jones affiliates’ $3.5 million cash bid.

        It’s just math. The Onion bid was higher, and the judge said that the losing bid should’ve been given an opportunity to improve the bid to get a chance to win, and maybe raise even more money.

      • user134450@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        a better than usual split for some families

        That is exactly what counts as credit in this case, because this split is made possible by some other families crediting the bid. Basically writing “i dont want this money give it to someone else” on a figurative piece of paper and bidding with that instead of cash.