Tag yourself: I’m the private landlords sharing their assets with the solarpunk community
AI-driven education
Is burning down the planet for the sake of creating AI slop somehow “solarpunk” now? Did they ask ChatGPT to create this chart, or what?
Global fund: A for-profit foundation with goal of becoming the world’s biggest pool of wealth
Green businesses: businesses focused on [blah blah blah] before profits
So are you chasing profits or not? Can’t even be internally consistent in your own flowchart.
It’s so silly when people want for-profit usage of capital, land and labour, but then also want capitalists to act against their interest, all without any sort of measures of enforcement.
Like, do these people think that the worst sum on this planet is just going to surrender their wealth out of their own good will?
Hey, quick question. Where are “Green Businesses” getting those necessary goods?
I’m sorry, perhaps I stuttered. Let me try that again.
WHERE ARE THEY GETTING THEIR RESOURCES?!
Get back here and answer the question!Where is the part for funding the solar punk army to defend against bourgeois assault against anything that challenges their system?
That’s George Orwell 1984 tankie authoritarianism, you red fascist
Y’know I already thought ‘solarpunks’ were pie-in-the-sky aesthetes just based off their inability to plan even the first steps for their utopia-- but seeing this? Honestly I’m just starting to think it’s a white cryptofash movement JUST from the “Non-solarpunk Citizens” bubble. Tell me this mfer never read a LICK of theory without telling me. The object is to reduce the amount of wretchedness of this earth; not increase it to bait more people into your aesthetic-driven ideology.
The OP is being pretty rightfully dunked on in his own post, with most people saying that it doesn’t fit their orientation at all.
If solarpunk has any meaning beyond pretty verdant pictures, it would include “human-scale energy usage” as a core principle. If anything, the alienation from energy at point of acquisition is one of the biggest pieces of sorcery required to make capitalism function.
The OP is being pretty rightfully dunked on in his own post,
Small mercies there, but that still doesn’t really change my view of solarpunk as more or less a bunch of aesthetes who can’t even get distribution of surplus crop around their communities right
AI-driven
private landlord
Wheres the role for CEO killers
I thought solarpunk was just like “let’s do brutalism with more greenery”, what the fuck is this shit
Solarpunk is a 100% vibes-based “ideology” where the aim is to get to a future that looks like this
It has no other political goals.
This looks like AI slop so much
Never trust a utopian concept art that doesn’t have benches.
“Less taxes” right there in the middle is giving something away methinks. This just seems like a great way to lessen the power of government and empower landlords and corporations who will pretty promise to not be mean.
I like the for profit global fund.
Looking forward to this replacing effective altruism as the reinvention of indulgences in a few decades.
It doesn’t even abolish landlords, what kind of weak ass shit is this. Read some fucking theory.
Put pressure on governments to minimize their power
Yeah I’m sure that will work
Put what pressure. How?
we go out and make a lot of noise together on wednesday afternoon and have the police cave our skulls in, repeat every week until we are all dead or in the super-panopticon
Ah, well, nevertheless!
This chart might be the biggest waste of 30mg Adderall in human history and that’s saying a lot.
That is one Escherian-ass flowchart
solarpunk lasted like a month before it got co-opted by the kind of people who watch kurzgesagt
I thought it was just people trying to make a positive cyberpunk, while missing the entire point of cyberpunk
Oh no, the neoliberal techbros stole solarpunk from the reactionary socialists!
“solarpunk is cryptofash” i scrawl on the blackboard for the 999th time. once more, with feeling!
Jesus, that bottom right pane. Why is it always ecofascism.
Wait what? Can you explain?
Funding is explicitly to come from “non-solarpunks” who live emiserated lives. Sounds like imperialism brought home to me.
I read that as ‘we sell food to other states in exchange for funds’, which is just normal global economics, but the rest of the chart is so odd that maybe I shouldn’t be giving them the benefit of the doubt.
It’s the combination of that and the “Global Fund” that combine to give me fash vibes.
